用固定协议的压缩方法,让量子态估计算法在少测量下仍保持高精度。
Fixed-Protocol Amortized MPS Tomography with Conformalized Predictive Uncertainty
- 设计固定协议的压缩估计器,基于局部可观测量进行条件推断
- 在10个量子比特上达到0.90保真度,相比仅用先验提升0.59
- 可覆盖未测量的可观测量,适合实际硬件验证场景
量子态层析样本稀缺,而制备的态位于一个狭窄的可学习流形上。仅用零测量先验控制表明,在集中态族中,先验估计已接近最优,因此‘少测量高保真’可能只是态族记忆而非真正层析;真正的测量高效需依赖能利用测量数据的模型。我们在共享的矩阵乘积态(MPS)核心参数化下研究两条路径。方法A通过测量引导的后验推断学习生成先验(经金标准验证,但其少测量性能主要来自先验)。方法B是我们的主要方案:一次训练的固定协议压缩式MPS估计器,使用规范不变保真度损失;我们刻意不使用置换不变集编码器(普通MLP即达效果)。关键在于测量设计:由于局部约化密度矩阵可确定χ-MPS,以‘信息性局部’泡利集合替代随机串作为测量,使原本平庸、易过拟合的估计器变为高保真(≈0.95,比先验+0.59),并通过打乱测量控制验证有效性。使用丢弃集成并共形校准,获得≈90%覆盖区间——包括从未测量的可观测量,而传统采样区间无法覆盖。性能随系统规模增长(n=10时保真度0.90,增益随n上升;χ=4时保真度0.88),参数化为多项式复杂度(原生收缩至20量子比特),并在IBM硬件上闭环验证(5个态,0.97保真度,基于硬件测得泡利值)。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Quantum state tomography is sample-starved, and the states one prepares live on a narrow, learnable manifold. A $k{=}0$ prior-only control shows that on concentrated families a prior estimate is already near-optimal, so ``high fidelity at few measurements'' can be family memorization rather than tomography; genuine measurement-efficiency needs a model that conditions on the measurements and demonstrably uses them. On a shared matrix-product-state (MPS) core parameterization we study two routes. Approach~A learns a generative prior over MPS cores with measurement-guided posterior inference (gold-standard-validated, but whose few-measurement accuracy the control shows is largely the prior). Approach~B, our main proposal, is a \emph{fixed-protocol amortized} MPS estimator trained once with a gauge-invariant fidelity loss; we deliberately do not rest it on a permutation-invariant set encoder (a plain MLP matches it). The decisive lever is the measurement design: motivated by the fact that local reduced density matrices determine a $χ$-MPS, conditioning on an \emph{informative local} Pauli set rather than random strings turns a modest, memorization-prone estimator into a high-fidelity one ($\approx\!0.95$, up to $+0.59$ over prior-only, decisively passing a shuffled-measurement control). A dropout ensemble, conformally recalibrated, gives $\approx\!90\%$-coverage intervals -- including for observables never measured, where a shot-based interval does not exist. Quality holds as the system grows (fidelity $0.90$ at $n{=}10$, gain \emph{growing} in $n$; $0.88$ at bond dimension $χ{=}4$), the parameterization is polynomial (native contraction to $20$ qubits), and we close the loop on IBM hardware ($5$ states at $0.97$ from hardware-measured Paulis).
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。