为可审计的智能体承诺设计可追踪的推理记录框架。
TRACE: An Operational Reasoning Schema for Auditable Agentic Commitments

- 提出带类型和版本的推理记录结构,强制无记录不变更状态。
- 通过八阶段写作流程与门控机制实现因果可追溯的决策记录。
- 适合需要可审计决策链的高风险应用,如医疗、救援系统。
本文定义了TRACE(Typed Reasoning And Commitment Evidence):一种带类型和版本的推理轨迹记录框架,包含参考编写规程与操作规范——无记录不进行持久状态变更。论文从三重层面论证:语言模型的自回归机制仅计算关联,链式思维与强化学习继承其局限;而从苏格拉底程序到佩尔阶梯等推理理论的形式化构造,在模型中并不存在。该框架以字段与测试回应缺失:包含TraceRecord及其因果特化形式,八阶段参考写作者,门控优先度量机制,以及TRACE-Bench评测协议。消费者包括记忆准入、计划门控、时间后悔与裁决复用,其可审计性作为记录质量的衡量标准。记录-消费者合约明确定义记录所担保内容及消费方义务,使框架成为可操作接口而非静态文档。文中两个示例展示:音乐教学推理从句子到类型化裁决,区分关联、干预与建议;洪水搜救案例中,预测世界模型自信地声称计划成功,但自身支持度与分布外得分矛盾,记录因此推迟承诺,请求有限观测,追加不可变更新,并切换分支。案例为示意性非实证,闭环评估留待未来,贡献在于框架与合约本身,非性能宣称。附录包含完整框架、写作者算法与成本模型、临床与政策示例、基准协议、收敛指标与使用场景。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
This paper defines TRACE (Typed Reasoning And Commitment Evidence): a typed, versioned schema for recording reasoning traces, a reference procedure for writing records against it, and one operating discipline, no durable state change without a record. The paper argues in three layers that reasoning is not in the language model: the autoregressive mechanism natively computes association; chain-of-thought and reinforcement learning inherit its limits; and the formal constructs of reasoning theory, from Socratic procedure to Pearl's ladder, are absent as machinery. The schema answers the absence with fields and tests: the TraceRecord and its causal specialization, an eight-stage reference writer, a gate-first measurement regime, the TRACE-Bench protocol, and the consumers, memory admission, plan gating, temporal regret, and verdict reuse, whose more auditable decisions are the measure of the record. A record-consumer contract states what a record guarantees and what a consumer must honor in return, making the schema an operational interface rather than a passive document. Two worked examples run in the main text: a music-lessons argument traced from sentence to typed verdict, separating association, intervention, and prescription; and a flood search-and-rescue vignette in which a predictive world model reports confident plan success that its own support and out-of-distribution scores contradict, so the record defers the commitment, requests a bounded observation, revises append-only, and clears a different branch. The vignette is illustrative, not empirical; closed-loop evaluation is left to future work, so the contribution is the schema and its contract, not a performance claim. Appendices carry the full schema, writer algorithms and cost model, clinical and policy illustrations, the benchmark protocol, convergence metrics, and usage scenarios.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。