提出反事实报告坐标，让大模型在压力下不盲从、有证据时能修正。

Aligned language models routinely misreport under non-evidential pressure: they cave to a confident user, yet fail to revise when genuine evidence arrives. We cast this as a failure of internal incentive-compatibility and study the two demands, resist (ignore forbidden pressure) and update (follow licensed evidence), on a Bayesian-witness benchmark with known posteriors, where the same user disagreement is evidence or pressure purely by stated source reliability, removing the evidence/pressure confound by construction. Using interchange interventions rather than probes, we causally localize low-rank report coordinates for answer, confidence, and caveat, establishing causal sufficiency at a late intervention site rather than uniqueness or necessity, with a causal cross-talk matrix showing strong own-coordinate control and only small cross-effects (partial functional disentanglement). We then introduce a training-free counterfactual report-coordinate (CRC) clamp that references the model's own report under an incentive-neutralized counterfactual of the prompt. The two-pass full-window clamp attains resist and update of $1.00$ jointly (Wilson 95% CI $[0.99,1.00]$; the rank-16 projection alone reaches $0.88/0.90$), which we read as a causal certificate and upper bound under a constructible reference, not a claim of a deployed solution. Tested global decoding and fixed-direction steering trade one objective against the other, and resist-only training collapses updating to $0.01$. The deployable single-pass compilation is lossy ($0.73/0.97$). The mechanism and the clamp reproduce across three model families and transfer to a natural sycophancy benchmark with significant paired improvements. Our contribution is the interface and certification method: activation-level counterfactual incentive-invariance as a structural primitive for internal incentive-compatibility.