用反事实推理增强GNN,让金融风险预测既准又可解释。
CausalGraphX: A Counterfactual Graph Neural Network Framework for Explainable Systemic Risk Assessment

- 结合图注意力与对抗正则化,捕捉机构脆弱性的因果特征。
- 在合成金融网络上预测级联违约准确率显著优于基线模型。
- 可生成最小注资金额等可操作的反事实解释,适合监管决策。
全球金融系统的相互关联性使其易受系统性风险影响,少数机构的失败可能引发灾难性连锁违约。传统风险模型难以捕捉此类网络的复杂非线性动态。尽管图神经网络(GNN)在建模关系数据方面表现良好,但主要学习相关性模式,属于黑箱模型,无法揭示冲击传播的因果机制,这对需要可解释模型进行压力测试和干预设计的监管机构而言是关键缺陷。本文提出CausalGraphX,一种将GNN与反事实推理相结合的新框架,实现可解释的系统性风险评估。该框架采用图注意力机制学习机构脆弱性表征,并利用对抗正则化确保表征反映因果驱动因素而非虚假相关。此外,我们提出基于优化的方法生成反事实解释,回答如“在特定压力情景下,对银行A注入多少最低资本可避免其违约?”等问题。我们在大规模合成金融网络上验证了CausalGraphX,结果表明其在预测级联违约方面显著优于传统及深度学习基线模型,同时提供稀疏、合理且可操作的反事实解释。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The interconnected nature of global financial systems makes them vulnerable to systemic risks, where the failure of a few institutions can trigger catastrophic cascading defaults. Traditional risk models often fail to capture the complex, non-linear dynamics of these networks. While Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have shown promise in modeling relational data, they primarily learn correlative patterns and function as black boxes, offering little insight into the causal mechanisms of shock propagation. This limitation is critical for regulators who require explainable models to perform stress tests and devise effective interventions. We introduce CausalGraphX, a novel framework that integrates GNNs with counterfactual reasoning to provide explainable assessments of systemic risk. CausalGraphX employs a Graph Attention mechanism to learn representations of institutional vulnerability and uses an adversarial regularization technique to ensure these representations capture causal drivers rather than spurious correlations. Furthermore, we propose an optimization-based approach to generate counterfactual explanations, answering questions such as, "What minimum capital injection would have prevented Bank A's default under a specific stress scenario?" We validate CausalGraphX on large-scale synthetic financial networks. Our results demonstrate that CausalGraphX significantly outperforms traditional and deep learning baselines in predicting cascading defaults while providing sparse, plausible, and actionable counterfactual explanations.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。