arXiv:2607.19408cs.LG2026-07中稿 · the 4th HiLD

小种群进化策略在大模型微调中表现不佳,根源是奖励设计而非规模限制。

Reward-Aware Population Scaling of Evolutionary Strategies in LLM Fine-Tuning

  • 用归一化奖励时小种群易失效,去归一化后N=2也能提升性能。
  • 二值奖励下,零优势概率与基础准确率、批量大小相关,可精确计算。
  • 适合关注高效微调和奖励机制优化的研究者,尤其在资源受限场景。

使用进化策略(ES)微调大语言模型具有内存效率高、可并行、兼容黑盒或离散奖励等优点。然而,关于种群规模的结论存在显著矛盾:以交叉熵(CE)为奖励时,N=1 即可成功;而采用二值奖励训练时,通常需要 N≈30。本文表明,这一差距主要源于奖励设计与归一化方式,而非种群规模本身。在研究的高能力模型场景中,z-score优势归一化会导致 N=2 失败。去除归一化后,二值奖励下的 ES 在 N=2 时仍能提升 GSM8K 与 TREC 性能,覆盖 0.5B-7B 参数量模型,而归一化版本则崩溃或退化。小种群失败风险由奖励粒度决定:二值准确率奖励的零优势概率 $q$ 可由基础准确率、批大小及成对正确性相关性闭式表达。对 Qwen2.5-Instruct/GSM8K 的零训练探针实验,12 种配置下均方绝对误差仅为 0.020,验证了公式有效性,并发现可用阈值 $N_{\mathrm{avail}}$ 在该场景下较小。这意味着,小种群在高能力模型的二值奖励 ES 中的失败,可能是实现问题而非固有局限。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Using Evolutionary Strategies (ES) for fine-tuning large language models is attractive because it is memory-efficient, parallel, and compatible with black-box or discrete rewards. Yet its population-size conclusions conflict sharply: fine-tuning with cross-entropy (CE) reward succeeds with $N=1$, while binary-reward training often needs $N \approx 30$. We show this gap is largely about reward design and normalization, not population size. In the capable-model regime we study, z-score advantage normalization can cause $N=2$ to fail. Disabling normalization lets binary-reward ES with $N=2$ improve on GSM8K and TREC across capable models spanning 0.5B-7B, where the normalized variant collapses or degrades. This small-$N$ risk is set by reward granularity: binary accuracy reward induces a zero-advantage probability $q$ that depends in closed form on base accuracy, batch size, and intra-pair correctness correlation; a zero-training probe on Qwen2.5-Instruct/GSM8K matches the formula with mean absolute error 0.020 across 12 configurations and finds the availability threshold $N_{\mathrm{avail}}$ to be small in this capable-model regime. The implication is not that $N=2$ is universally sufficient, but that small-population failure in capable-model binary ES can be an implementation artifact rather than an intrinsic population limit.

进化策略大模型微调奖励设计小样本优化

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。