arXiv:2607.19718cs.CL2026-07中稿 · CLEF 2026 HIPE Sha…被引 1

不依赖预训练模型,用轻量图模型提取历史报纸中人地关系。

Lightweight Person-Place Relation Extraction from Historical Newspapers with Dependency Graphs and Proximity Features

论文配图:Lightweight Person-Place Relation Extraction from Historical Newspapers with Dependency Graphs and Proximity Features
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 构建文档级依存图,结合距离与词性特征进行关系分类
  • 最佳模型宏召回达0.5142,效率排名第三,准确率中等
  • 最小字符距离已含主要信号,分组交叉验证避免数据泄露

HIPE-2026 共享任务将多语言历史报纸中的人地关系抽取设为新评测赛道,需对英、法、德语种中预标注的人物与地点提及判断 at 与 isAt 关系。为降低大规模处理历史档案的成本,我们团队(DS@GT HIPE,官方结果第2名)探索在关系分类阶段完全不使用预训练语言模型的轻量可解释系统能走多远。方法基于依存句法分析构建文档级图结构,提取每对实体的邻近度与词性特征,采用小型 scikit-learn 集成或紧凑图注意力网络进行分类,所有提交运行参数均低于847K。在官方测试集(Test A)上,最优结果宏召回达0.5142,效率榜第3,准确率居17支队伍中游。两个关键发现:其一,仅靠最小字符距离即可捕获大部分分类信号;增加其他工程特征收益不稳定,甚至导致性能下降,印证了论元距离主导关系抽取的结论;其二,文档分组交叉验证至关重要:按对划分会因实体提及跨文档重复而使得分虚高25–37个百分点,分组验证有效消除该数据泄露效应。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

The HIPE-2026 shared task introduces person-place relation extraction from multilingual historical newspapers as a new evaluation track, classifying the at and isAt relations between pre-annotated person and location mentions in English, French, and German. Motivated by the cost of processing historical archives at scale, our team (DS@GT HIPE, team 2 in the official results) investigates how far a lightweight, interpretable system can go without any pretrained language model at the relation classification stage. Our approach builds a document-level graph from dependency parses, extracts proximity-based and part-of-speech features for each entity pair, and classifies them with small scikit-learn ensembles or compact Graph Attention Networks, keeping every submitted run under 847K parameters. On the official evaluation (Test A, the newspaper test set), our best run reached a macro recall of 0.5142, ranking 3rd on the Efficiency profile while placing mid-table on Accuracy among the 17 participating teams. Two findings stand out. First, minimum character distance alone captures most of the classification signal; adding further engineered features yields inconsistent gains and sometimes degrades performance, echoing prior evidence that argument distance dominates relation extraction. Second, document-grouped cross-validation is essential on this corpus: pair-level splits inflate scores by 25-37 percentage points because entity mentions recur across documents, a data-leakage effect that grouped cross-validation removes.

关系抽取轻量化历史文本图神经网络

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。