对比三个R包在真实数据上的NMF性能，帮研究者选合适工具。

Non--negative matrix factorization (NMF) has become an established dimensionality reduction technique for extracting latent structures from non--negative data and has found widespread applications in fields such as bioinformatics, text mining, image analysis, and recommender systems. As the popularity of NMF has increased, numerous \textit{R} packages implementing different optimization strategies and computational frameworks have been developed. Despite their widespread availability, comprehensive evaluations of these implementations under real--world data conditions remain limited. Consequently, researchers often lack objective guidance when selecting an appropriate package for practical applications. This study introduces a new \textit{R} package for NMF and offers asystematic performance comparison with two widely available \textit{R} packages for NMF analysis. Rather than relying on simulated datasets, the evaluation is conducted using real--world data to better reflect the complexity, heterogeneity, and noise characteristics encountered in practical analytical settings. The packages are assessed using a consistent experimental framework, with emphasis on computational efficiency, convergence behavior, reconstruction accuracy, memory utilization, and the stability of the resulting matrix factorization.