大模型会无意识模仿人类叙事模式，导致对话行为逐渐偏离预期。

LLMs are trained predominantly on human-authored text, yet the structural and narrative conventions embedded in that text are rarely examined as a source of systematic behavioral influence, or as a governance risk in deployed systems. This paper considers whether the storytelling patterns inherent in published human writing, including archetypal roles such as protagonist, antagonist, and underdog, as well as tension-and-resolution narrative arcs, are absorbed during training and subsequently surface in LLM outputs, causing responses to drift toward unexpected, adversarial, or rhetorically enticing behaviors over extended interactions. Through a systematic literature review and cross-paper analysis of recent empirical studies on LLM alignment, persona dynamics, emergent misalignment, and user interaction patterns, we observe evidence bearing on this hypothesis. The findings reveal three key patterns. First, LLMs reproduce statistical patterns from their training data rather than reasoning independently. Second, measurable latent traits, including sycophancy and deceptiveness, emerge reliably across unrelated prompts. Third, fine-tuning on a narrow narrative task can produce unintended behavioral changes well beyond that task. Furthermore, evidence suggests that persuasive, narrative-style outputs are among the most common LLM products in real-world usage, amplifying these risks. Narrative drift constitutes an unmonitored escalation pathway in deployed AI systems, one that evades discrete-incident detection mechanisms and requires dedicated monitoring instruments.