用向量与树结构联合检索,提升科学问答的准确率与效率
VecTree-RAG: An Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework Combining Vector and Tree Retrieval for Efficiency and Accuracy
- 分两步检索:向量找相关论文,树结构精确定位证据段落
- 在三个数据集上表现最优,证据定位精度达0.274,显著高于基线
- 适合需要可追溯、高精度的科学文献问答场景
科学问题回答需解决两个任务:识别相关论文并定位其支持性证据。传统RAG方法通过固定长度片段的相似性搜索处理二者,破坏文档结构,使科学论断与其方法和论证背景分离。本文提出VecTree-RAG,一种智能体框架,将两项任务分配给互补的检索机制:向量搜索对整个语料库的文档与章节表示进行排序,而推理引导的源验证章节树遍历则在筛选出的论文中精确定位证据。全文保留在页面存储中,仅在结构定位后逐步暴露。我们在300个QASPER问题、54个LitQA2的开放子集及49个多文档MOSAIC问题上评估该框架。相比Dense RAG、重排序Dense RAG、RAPTOR和Search-o1,VecTree-RAG在三个基准上均取得最高得分,在QASPER上达到0.800的LLM判断正确率,LitQA2上为0.925准确率,MOSAIC上复合得分为0.547。在QASPER上,其证据页精确率为0.274,远超基线的0.046–0.071。LitQA2消融实验进一步显示,完整向量-树架构所需推理标记数少于无树导航或无语料库级向量路由的变体。结果表明,向量检索缩小语料范围,树导航聚焦于结构相关的证据。尽管多轮推理仍比单次检索昂贵,但VecTree-RAG提供了一种结构感知且可追溯的科学文献问答架构。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Scientific question answering requires a retrieval system to solve two distinct problems: identifying which papers are relevant and locating the supporting evidence within those papers. Conventional retrieval-augmented generation typically addresses both through similarity search over fixed-length passages, flattening document structure and separating scientific claims from their methodological and argumentative context. We present VecTree-RAG, an agentic framework that assigns these tasks to complementary retrieval mechanisms. Vector search ranks compact document and section representations across the corpus, whereas reasoning-guided traversal of source-verified section trees localizes evidence within shortlisted papers. Full text is retained in a page store and exposed progressively only after structural localization. We evaluate VecTree-RAG on 300 QASPER questions, an open-access subset of 54 LitQA2 questions, and 49 multi-document MOSAIC questions. Compared with Dense RAG, reranked Dense RAG, RAPTOR, and Search-o1, VecTree-RAG obtained the highest observed answer score on all three benchmarks, reaching 0.800 LLM-judge correctness on QASPER, 0.925 accuracy on LitQA2, and a 0.547 composite score on MOSAIC. On QASPER, its evidence-page precision was 0.274, compared with 0.046--0.071 for the baselines. LitQA2 ablations further showed that the complete vector--tree architecture required fewer inference tokens than variants without tree navigation or corpus-level vector routing. These results indicate that vector retrieval narrows the corpus-level search space and tree navigation concentrates reading on structurally relevant evidence. Although multi-turn inference remains more expensive than single-call retrieval, VecTree-RAG provides a structure-aware and traceable architecture for scientific literature question answering.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。