用有序网络分析揭示协作中认知情绪的动态演变规律
Ordered Network Analysis of Epistemic Emotions during Collaborative Problem Solving

- 采用有序网络分析方法研究情绪状态的持续与转换模式
- 发现好奇、乐观与困惑构成稳定的情绪核心,不同报告方式强调不同连接
- 快组与慢组在冲突情境下困惑与脱离的互动关系显著不同
探究在面对面协作问题解决(CPS)过程中,困惑与挫败等情感状态如何持续并相互转化,对理解认知情绪动态至关重要。然而,由于该领域缺乏金标准标注,情感状态的准确识别仍具挑战。本文通过回顾性线索回忆收集的实时情感数据,运用有序网络分析(ONA)考察:(1)情感状态的整体有序结构及其在自我报告与提示报告两种方式下的差异;(2)快速组与慢速组在该结构中的表现差异。结果表明,ONA揭示了仅靠描述性总结无法捕捉的持久性与转移模式。特别地,我们发现好奇、乐观与困惑之间存在稳定的认知核心,而不同报告方式强化了不同状态间的关联。快组与慢组的对比显示,困惑与脱离在冲突情境下的角色发生显著转变。研究结合协作背景进行解释,并探讨其对支持协作问题解决的AI系统设计的意义。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Investigating how affective states such as confusion and frustration persist and transition during co-situated collaborative problem solving (CPS) is important for understanding the dynamics of epistemic emotions. However, the accurate identification of affective states remain challenging as there is no gold-standard truth in this space. Here, we analyze affective states collected through retrospective cued-recall during an in-person CPS task. Using ordered network analysis (ONA), we examine (1) the overall ordered structure of affective states and how this structure differs across self-caught and probe-caught reporting methods, and (2) what aspects of this ordered structure are emphasized differently in slower and faster groups. We find that ONA reveals differences in persistence and transition patterns that are not apparent from descriptive summaries alone. In particular, we observe a stable epistemic core linking curiosity, optimism, and confusion, with different reporting methods emphasizing different connections among states. An analysis between faster and slower groups show that roles of confusion and disengagement also shift significantly during collaboration, particularly in their relationship to conflict. We interpret our findings in the context of collaboration and discuss their implications in developing AI systems that support CPS.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。