arXiv:2607.23501cs.LGnlin.CD2026-07

用物理约束神经网络从噪声数据中发现三体问题新周期轨道。

Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Discovering Periodic Orbits in the Gravitational Three-Body Problem

论文配图:Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Discovering Periodic Orbits in the Gravitational Three-Body Problem
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 基于二阶微分方程与傅里叶特征,无初始条件训练即可捕捉周期轨道。
  • 23%~25%的实验结果复现了训练数据外的轨道家族。
  • 训练数据源决定轨道分布,随机种子仅影响具体选择。

在混沌动力系统中寻找周期解通常需要接近目标轨道的初始猜测才能收敛。本文展示,通过在稀疏、含噪观测数据上训练物理信息神经网络(PINNs),即使不提供初始条件,也能恢复引力三体问题的周期轨道,包括训练数据中未包含的轨道族。该方法依赖于二阶常微分方程形式、固定频率傅里叶特征、百分位自适应优化和可训练缩放参数,均在正向问题中验证。在两个100次种子的集成实验中,23%~25%的运行成功恢复了训练数据外的轨道族。进一步分析发现,改变训练数据来源显著改变恢复轨道的分布(p < 0.001,Cramér's V = 0.339),而初始化分布差异则无显著影响(p = 0.620,V = 0.094)。随机种子决定具体恢复哪一族,但权重分布不影响总体频率;唯有训练数据源起决定作用。实验证明所恢复轨道是可验证的:经精炼后成为真实周期解——在拉格朗日数据上训练的网络恢复出八字形舞蹈轨道(Li--Liao I.A.1类,$T^*$匹配至七位有效数字);在八字形数据上训练的网络恢复出布罗克-哈吉德梅特里乌-赫农轨道,闭合误差 $δ_T < 10^{-9}$。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Locating periodic solutions of chaotic dynamical systems normally requires an initial guess close enough to the target orbit for numerical continuation or gradient-based search to converge. We show that Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) trained on sparse, noisy observations \emph{without} initial conditions recover periodic orbits of the gravitational three-body problem, including orbit families absent from the training data. The method rests on a second-order ODE formulation, fixed-frequency Fourier features, percentile-based adaptive refinement, and a trainable scaling parameter, each validated on forward problems. Across two 100-seed ensembles, $23$--$25\%$ of runs converge to families not present in the training data. We then ask what determines which family emerges. Two $χ^2$ tests give a consistent answer: changing the training data source significantly shifts the distribution of recovered families ($p < 0.001$, Cramér's $V = 0.339$), whereas switching between the two initialization distributions tested does not ($p = 0.620$, $V = 0.094$). The random seed selects which family a given run recovers; the \emph{distribution} the weights are drawn from does not shift the aggregate frequencies, but the training data does. The evidence is empirical: we do not characterize the loss landscape analytically, and PINNs remain slower than conventional integrators on well-posed initial-value problems. What the experiments establish is that the recovered orbits are verifiable rather than merely plausible: the identified ones refine to genuine periodic solutions, a network trained on Lagrange data recovers the figure-eight choreography (Li--Liao class I.A.1, matched to seven significant digits in $T^*$), and one trained on figure-eight data recovers a Broucke--Hadjidemetriou--Hénon orbit closing to $δ_T < 10^{-9}$.

三体问题神经网络周期轨道物理信息

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。