arXiv:2607.24160cs.LG2026-07

融合树模型与神经网络,提升小样本生态分类精度与可靠性

Calibrated Tree-Neural Fusion for Fine-Grained Vegetation Community Classification

论文配图:Calibrated Tree-Neural Fusion for Fine-Grained Vegetation Community Classification
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 用树模型和神经网络概率融合,结合元学习与温度校准
  • 测试集准确率80.00%,宏F1达77.68%,校准后误差降至6.51%
  • 适合生态监测、小样本精细分类,性能稳定可复现

精确的植被群落分类对异质景观中的生态监测、生境评估和科学环境管理至关重要。现有方法多依赖独立的树集成或通用神经网络,但细粒度生态类别常具有重叠的光谱、地形和结构特征。许多框架缺乏对堆叠泄漏的防护、概率校准不足、少数类评估薄弱,且在重复数据分割下表现不稳定。为此,本研究提出Calibrated EcoTreeFuseNet-Plus,一种树-神经概率融合框架,结合留出样本树概率、EcoFuseNet-V2输出、验证集选择的元学习及后处理温度校准。从六种激光雷达导出的地貌与冠层变量及两种高光谱植被指数中提取坐标点栅格值。质量控制剔除26个缺失高程和1个非有限NDWI样本,共保留1,833条完整记录,涵盖29类植被与非植被。在保留测试集上,模型准确率达0.8000,宏F1得分为0.7768,平衡准确率为0.7903,马修斯相关系数为0.7903。校准将期望校准误差从0.3866降至0.0651,未改变分类结果。五次种子评估的宏F1为0.7717 ± 0.0112,表明跨分割稳定性良好。结果证明该方法在小样本、细粒度生态分类中实现了可靠的判别-校准权衡。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Accurate vegetation-community classification is essential for ecological monitoring, habitat assessment, and evidence-based environmental management in heterogeneous landscapes. Existing studies often rely on standalone tree ensembles or generic neural networks, although fine-grained ecological classes frequently exhibit overlapping spectral, topographic, and structural characteristics. Many frameworks also provide limited protection against stacking leakage, insufficient probability calibration, weak minority-class evaluation, and little evidence of stability across repeated data splits. To address these limitations, this study proposes Calibrated EcoTreeFuseNet-Plus, a tree-neural probability-fusion framework that combines out-of-fold tree probabilities, EcoFuseNet-V2 outputs, validation-selected meta-learning, and post-hoc temperature scaling. Raster values from six LiDAR-derived terrain and canopy variables and two hyperspectral vegetation indices were extracted at coordinate-based reference locations. Quality control removed 26 samples with missing elevation and one sample with non-finite NDWI, producing 1,833 complete records across 29 vegetation and non-vegetation classes. On the held-out test set, the proposed model achieved an accuracy of 0.8000, a macro F1-score of 0.7768, a balanced accuracy of 0.7903, and an MCC of 0.7903. Calibration reduced the expected calibration error from 0.3866 to 0.0651 without changing class predictions. Five-seed evaluation yielded a macro F1-score of 0.7717 +/- 0.0112, indicating stable performance across repeated splits. The results demonstrate a reliable discrimination-calibration trade-off for small-sample, fine-grained ecological classification.

植被分类概率校准融合模型生态遥感

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。