首个面向中文文档检索与问答的基准,评测大模型在真实文档场景下的理解能力。
CHaystack: Benchmarking Chinese Document Retrieval and VQA

- 构建覆盖四类中文文档的DocumentVQA基准,涵盖学术论文、广告等真实场景。
- Qwen3-VL在检索上达71.91 Recall@1,远超其他模型(最高仅14.40)。
- 发现中文文本编码是核心挑战,现有模型在图文混合文档中表现不一。
检索增强生成(RAG)显著扩展了大语言模型的内存能力,近年已从纯文本向多模态演进。在文档理解领域,文档视觉问答(DocumentVQA)从单文档问答发展为基于大规模文档集合的检索-生成流程。然而,针对中文大规模文档检索与问答的基准仍为空白。为此,我们提出CHaystack,一个包含学术论文、广告、网页及真实拍摄文档四类的中文DocumentVQA基准,支持对系统进行全面评估。同时,我们提出CDocRAG,利用基于视觉语言模型(VLM)的相关性过滤器,在生成答案前验证检索到的文档图像。我们在CHaystack上评估主流开源嵌入与生成模型。结果表明:Qwen系列模型在文本丰富的文档(如网页、论文)上表现最佳;其他模型在视觉丰富的广告类别中表现尚可,但在文本密集文档上严重退化。检索方面,Qwen3-VL达到71.91 Recall@1,而最优非Qwen模型仅为14.40。这表明当前中文大规模DocumentVQA的核心挑战在于中文文本编码,仍有巨大提升空间。代码与数据集见https://github.com/hanxi19/CHaystack。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has made substantial progress in extending the memory of large language models (LLMs), and recent advances have further pushed RAG from pure text settings toward multimodal scenarios. In the document understanding domain, document visual question answering (DocumentVQA) has evolved from question answering over a single document to retrieval-and-generation pipelines over large-scale document collections. However, a benchmark specifically designed for Chinese large-scale document retrieval and question answering is still lacking. To bridge this gap, we introduce CHaystack, a new Chinese DocumentVQA benchmark that covers four document categories, namely academic papers, advertisements, web pages, and real-world photographed documents, enabling a more comprehensive evaluation of DocumentVQA systems. In addition, we present CDocRAG, a Chinese DocumentVQA system that uses a VLM-based relevance filter to verify retrieved document images before answer generation. We evaluate representative open-source embedding and generation models on CHaystack. The results reveal a clear contrast in category-wise strengths: Qwen-family models perform best on text-rich documents such as webpages and papers, whereas other models only achieve competitive results on visually rich categories such as advertisements and degrade sharply on text-dense documents. For retrieval, Qwen3-VL reaches 71.91 Recall@1 while the best non-Qwen model achieves only 14.40. These results indicate that the core challenge of CHaystack lies in Chinese textual encoding, and that Chinese large-scale DocumentVQA still leaves substantial room for improvement. Our code and dateset is available at https://github.com/hanxi19/CHaystack.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。