研究生成式AI中内容创作者为获取引用曝光而竞争的动态机制。
Learning Dynamics of Strategic Publishers in Generative AI Ecosystems

- 构建博弈论模型,分析创作者在生成式搜索中的策略行为
- 发现现有机制易导致系统不稳定,仅部分机制能实现均衡稳定
- 揭示创作者与用户福利间的权衡,指导平台设计机制选择
生成式AI(GenAI)搜索系统正改变用户获取信息的方式。与传统基于排名的系统不同,GenAI系统根据用户提问生成回答,并常附带外部来源引用。内容创作者为获得更多曝光可能采取策略行为,与其他创作者竞争用户注意力。不同于排名系统中通过优化内容提升排名,生成式系统中创作者可通过被生成内容引用获得曝光。本文提出一种新颖的博弈论模型,描述生成式AI生态中创作者围绕引用曝光的竞争。研究在更好响应动态下的学习演化,将学习收敛至均衡视为生态系统稳定的标志。借助势博弈理论,分析多种已知内容选择机制下的系统稳定性。结果表明,代表现实系统机制的方案存在不稳定性,而特定机制可诱导稳定生态。通过大规模仿真分析不同机制下的稳定性与福利表现,仿真结果支持理论发现,并揭示稳定性、创作者福利与用户福利之间的复杂权衡。尤其指出,稳定机制未必最大化整体福利,对平台设计具有重要启示。进一步研究表明,合理选择生成式机制可实现创作者福利与各类用户福利间的期望权衡。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Generative AI (GenAI) search systems are transforming how users access information. Unlike ranking-based search systems, where users observe a ranked list of documents, GenAI search systems, given a user's question, generate an answer, often accompanied by external sources (e.g., in the form of citations). Content creators (publishers) seeking to increase exposure might behave strategically and compete with other creators for users' attention. While publishers in ranking-based systems might strategically modify their content to improve its ranking, the incentives in generative systems take on a new form. Publishers may now gain exposure through generated responses and attributions to those responses. We introduce a novel game-theoretic model of the emerging GenAI ecosystem in which publishers compete for attribution-based exposure. We study the learning dynamics of strategic content creators under better-response dynamics. We associate the convergence of learning dynamics to equilibrium with ecosystem stability. Employing the notion of potential games, we study the stability of GenAI ecosystems under several known content selection mechanisms. We demonstrate the instability of mechanisms representing real-world modern systems and characterize a mechanism that induces a stable ecosystem. We conduct extensive simulations to analyze the stability and welfare of GenAI ecosystems under various mechanisms. The simulations support our theoretical findings and reveal an interplay among stability, publisher welfare, and user welfare. In particular, stable mechanisms do not necessarily maximize welfare, demonstrating an important trade-off for platform designers. We then introduce a study illustrating that the proper selection of the GenAI mechanism enables the manifestation of desired trade-offs between publisher welfare and the different sources of user welfare.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。