arXiv:2607.26121cs.ROcs.AI2026-07被引 2

提出可信赖具身智能的分层框架与信任等级体系。

Towards Trustworthy Embodied Intelligence: A Systems Framework and Graded Trustworthiness Levels

论文配图:Towards Trustworthy Embodied Intelligence: A Systems Framework and Graded Trustworthiness Levels
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 构建四层架构:模型、系统、证据、部署层协同保障安全
  • 定义‘持续安全成功’目标,强调风险可控与任务可靠并重
  • 分级信任体系助力部署评估与未来标准制定

具身智能融合感知、决策、实时计算与物理交互,其失败可能引发即时物理或操作伤害,仅完成任务不足以体现可信性。本文将可信赖具身智能定义为在环境与系统变化下持续可靠执行任务且风险可控的能力,称为“持续安全成功”。该目标通过四个相互依赖的层次实现:模型层生成带校准不确定性的动作建议及显式安全偏好;系统层通过集成传感、计算、控制、硬件防护、故障隔离与备用机制可靠执行授权动作;证据层通过评估、验证、确认、可追溯性与结构化保证论证支撑有限性声明;部署层通过运行时监控、权限管理、干预、事故响应与受控更新维持声明有效性。由于假设与故障在各层间传播,单一模型能力、孤立防护或基准性能均无法建立端到端可信性。结合具身人工智能、机器人学、控制理论、可靠计算、分布式系统与自动驾驶技术,本文进一步提出非规范化的信任等级层次,按任务能力、安全性、系统保障、运营治理与支持证据对部署声明的强度进行分级,为有限部署、对比评估、研究优先级设定与未来标准化提供基础。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Embodied intelligence integrates learned perception and decision making with real-time computation, control, and physical interaction. Because failures can cause immediate physical or operational harm, task completion alone does not establish trustworthiness. We define trustworthy embodied intelligence as the sustained capacity to execute specified tasks reliably under environmental and system variation while maintaining risk within acceptable bounds. We term this objective sustained safe success. Its supporting mechanisms are organized into four interdependent layers. The model layer generates task-competent action proposals with calibrated uncertainty and explicit safety preferences. The system layer realizes authorized actions dependably through integrated sensing, computation, control, hardware safeguards, fault containment, and fallback. The evidence layer substantiates bounded claims through evaluation, verification, validation, traceability, and structured assurance arguments. The deployment layer maintains claim validity through runtime monitoring, authority management, intervention, incident response, and controlled updates. Because assumptions and failures propagate across these layers, neither model capability, isolated safeguards, nor benchmark performance alone can establish end-to-end trustworthiness. Drawing on embodied AI, robotics, control, dependable computing, distributed systems, and autonomous driving, we further propose a non-normative hierarchy of trustworthiness levels. This hierarchy grades the strength of bounded deployment claims across task capability, safety, system assurance, operational governance, and supporting evidence, providing a basis for bounded deployment, comparative evaluation, research prioritization, and future standardization.

具身智能信任度系统架构安全评估

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。