arXiv:2607.27547cs.AIcs.CY2026-07

AI素养应从使用技能转向批判与参与,打破技术垄断。

AI Literacy: An Exercise in Power-Knowledge

  • 以权力-知识理论重构AI素养,强调批判性思考。
  • 提出三阶段框架:情境使用、批判质询、参与治理。
  • 适合关注技术公平与数字权利的教育研究者。

随着生成式人工智能成为社会知识生产的重要系统,谁能够获取并塑造这一生产体系的问题日益突出。本文指出,当前以技术能力与负责任使用为核心的AI素养框架,因强化了‘消费者’定位而不足,未能培养真正的认识论自主性。基于福柯的权力-知识观、弗莱雷的批判意识教育及数字素养研究,本文主张将AI素养重新定义为一种批判实践,使个体不仅使用AI,更能批判评估其逻辑、抵抗其隐含假设,并参与治理。论文进一步强调,社会中对AI工具的不平等获取再现了长期存在的认识论不公,因此赋能型素养框架必须回应结构性不平等。由此提出一个三部分框架:情境化使用、批判性质询与参与式治理,将素养视为培育认识论‘主体’而非训练信息消费者的过程。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

As generative artificial intelligence becomes one of the most significant systems of knowledge production in our society today, questions relating to who can access and shape that production grow increasingly important in our discourse. This paper argues that the existing frameworks for AI literacy, which are dominated by technical competency and responsible-use principles, are insufficient because they enforce a "consumer" orientation toward AI rather than fostering genuine epistemic agency. Based upon Foucault's concept of power-knowledge, Freire's pedagogy of critical consciousness, and scholarship of digital literacy, this paper proposes a reconceptualization of AI literacy as a critical practice that equips individuals not just to use AI systems, but to critically evaluate them, resist their structuring assumptions, and participate in their governance. The paper further argues that unequal access to AI tools in society recapitulates longstanding epistemic injustices, and that a literacy framework oriented toward empowerment must account for these structural inequities. A three-part framework of AI literacy based on the notions of contextual use, critical interrogation, and participatory governance frames this literacy as a cultivation of epistemic "agents" rather than the training of competent consumers of AI-generated information.

AI素养批判思维数字正义

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。