arXiv:2607.28410cs.CEcs.CL2026-07被引 1

用大模型智能拆分大单交易,降成本提效率。

Can Large Language Models Execute Parent Orders?

  • 分两阶段规划执行:先长期策略后短期操作
  • 实测比主流方法快0.65个基点,性能更强
  • 适合量化交易、算法投研人员参考

父订单执行是算法交易的核心问题,目标是将大额订单拆分为小单以降低执行成本。现有方法或依赖可能失效的市场假设,或需针对任务训练,限制了对新场景的适应性。本文首次系统研究大语言模型(LLMs)在父订单执行中的应用,将大模型在金融领域的使用从‘买什么’扩展到‘如何执行’。提出PACE(Plan-Ahead Controlled Execution)框架,通过分层设计将执行分解为长周期规划与短周期执行,无需显式市场假设或任务特定训练。在深交所一级数据上的实验表明,PACE优于TWAP、Almgren-Chriss及基于学习的基线模型,超越最强基线0.65个基点。行为分析显示,大模型决策逻辑与人类不同:模型置信度越高表现越好,且更早交易而非拖延至截止时间。结果表明大模型可辅助人类交易员做出更优执行决策。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Parent-order execution is a core problem in algorithmic trading, where the goal is to split a large order into smaller orders while reducing execution costs. Existing approaches either rely on pre-specified market assumptions that may not hold in practice, or require task-specific training that limits adaptability to new settings. To overcome these limitations, we present the first systematic study of large language models (LLMs) for parent-order execution. This extends the use of LLMs in finance from what to trade to how to execute. We propose PACE (Plan-Ahead Controlled Execution), a hierarchical framework that decomposes parent-order execution into long-horizon planning and short-horizon execution, requiring neither explicit market assumptions nor task-specific training. Experiments on Shenzhen Stock Exchange Level-1 data show that PACE outperforms TWAP, Almgren-Chriss, and learning-based baselines, exceeding the strongest baseline by 0.65 bps. Behavioral analysis reveals that LLMs make execution decisions differently from human investors: higher model confidence predicts better performance rather than worse returns, and the model trades earlier rather than procrastinating toward the deadline. These findings suggest that LLMs can complement human traders in execution decisions.

算法交易大模型应用量化投资

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。