arXiv:2607.28997cs.IR2026-07KDD被引 1

用大模型推理提升地点推荐精准度,解决用户行为模式捕捉难问题。

Think2Go: Generative Next POI Recommendation with LLM Reasoning

论文配图:Think2Go: Generative Next POI Recommendation with LLM Reasoning
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 融合监督微调与强化学习,让模型同时记忆习惯并动态推理。
  • 通过不确定性加权和奖励归一化,提升推荐多样性与稳定性。
  • 适合对个性化推荐、智能导航感兴趣的开发者与研究者。

下一个兴趣点(POI)推荐旨在从历史签到数据中挖掘用户行为偏好,为下个目的地提供个性化建议。现有方法主要依赖浅层上下文信息和手工特征交互,难以捕捉深层意图;而大语言模型(LLMs)因对语义ID(SIDs)理解不足,表现受限。为此,我们提出Think2Go,一种新型生成式下一POI推荐框架,通过测试时计算扩展,增强对SID表示的理解,并探索多样时空模式。该框架统一监督微调(SFT)与基于强化学习(RL)的推理,在单一架构中联合优化记忆与自适应推理,更好保留用户行为模式并拓展偏好。为校准自适应推理中的策略优化,提出两种优势加权机制:(1) 基于核密度估计的提示认知不确定性,评估查询与历史的时空周期性匹配度,高不确定性时促进探索;(2) 奖励感知的优势缩放,通过归一化奖励与最大值,调节更新幅度,提升训练稳定性并缓解对噪声信号的过拟合。该联合校准形成隐式课程学习策略,实现细粒度、实例感知的策略更新,防止熵崩溃,支持稳健探索。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Next Point-of-Interest (POI) recommendation task focuses on mining user behavioral preference patterns from historical check-ins to provide personalized suggestions for the next destination. Existing methods primarily rely on shallow contextual information and handcrafted feature interactions to predict the next POI. However, the inherent sparsity and complexity of user mobility patterns limit the computational capacity of non-reasoning models to capture deep intent, while large language models (LLMs) perform suboptimally because they lack a deep understanding of semantic IDs (SIDs) when SIDs are trained separately. To address these limitations, we propose Think2Go, a novel generative next POI recommendation framework, which enhances the model's comprehension of SID representations and explores diverse spatial-temporal patterns via test-time computational scaling. We unify supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL)-based reasoning within a single architecture, enabling joint optimization of memorization and adaptive reasoning to better retain user behavior patterns while exploring diverse user preferences. To further calibrate policy optimization in adaptive reasoning, we propose two advantage weighting mechanisms that integrate (1) prompt epistemic uncertainty, estimated via kernel density methods to assess the spatial-temporal periodic pattern alignment between queries and user history, promoting increased exploration under high epistemic uncertainty; and (2) reward-informed advantage scaling, captured by normalizing rewards against their maxima to adapt update magnitudes, thereby improving training stability and mitigating overfitting to noisy signals. This joint calibration forms an implicit curriculum learning strategy, delivering fine-grained, instance-aware policy updates that prevent entropy collapse and support robust exploration.

POI推荐大模型推理生成式推荐

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。