arXiv:2608.07473cs.AIcs.MA2026-08被引 1

用论证计算框架支撑可解释、可争议的AI决策支持

Towards an Argumentative Foundation for Evaluative AI

论文配图:Towards an Argumentative Foundation for Evaluative AI
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 以计算论证为框架,构建可形式化、可计算的评估型AI基础
  • 支持多假说并列呈现,同时提供正反证据,促进人机协作决策
  • 适合需要透明、可辩论的AI应用,如医疗、司法等高风险领域

评估型AI(EAI)被提出作为辅助人类决策的新方式:不给出单一推荐,而是同时呈现多个竞争性假设及其支持与反对的证据。本文主张,计算论证是建立此类可解释、可争议的EAI形式的理想范式,能够为其提供正式且可计算的基础,为未来分布式、以人为本的EAI系统奠定长期研究基础。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Evaluative AI (EAI) has been recently proposed as a way to support human decision-making, not by producing a single recommendation, but by presenting competing hypotheses together with evidence for and against each. In this position paper, we advocate (computational) argumentation as a particularly suitable paradigm to provide a formal, computable foundation for forms of EAI that are explainable and contestable, setting the ground for a long-term research agenda towards distributed and human-centred EAI systems.

评估型AI计算论证可解释AI

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。