arXiv:2608.08825cs.LGcs.AI2026-08中稿 · and presented at I…

用经典模型补足大模型短板,提升高频股票预测精度

Hybrid Neural-Classical Correction for Frozen Time Series Foundation Models: A Comprehensive Ablation Study on High-Frequency Stock Prediction

  • 混合神经与经典方法,用随机森林修正冻结的大模型
  • 预测相关性提升6.4倍,最优方案仅需49K神经参数
  • 简单模型胜过复杂结构,经典方法贡献最大

时间序列基础模型虽具零样本泛化能力,但在高频金融领域表现不佳。本文系统研究将冻结的TimesFM(200M参数)适配至开盘时段股票收益率预测的混合神经-经典修正方法。对比两种神经修正架构:AttnCorrect(约471K参数,多头自注意力)与GatedLinear(约49K参数,低秩双线性投影+门控),均结合随机森林残差学习。在10只科技股(NVDA、MSFT、AAPL、GOOG、GOOGL、AMZN、META、AVGO、TSLA、NFLX)共200万数据点上进行系统消融实验,发现:(1) 混合方法实现0.597的合并相关性,较冻结TimesFM平均每日相关性提升6.4倍;(2) 经典残差学习(随机森林)贡献最大,可媲美甚至超过神经组件;(3) 移除经典学习后,更简单的神经架构反而优于复杂结构;(4) 自注意力在纯神经组件中贡献最大。GatedLinear+RF以9倍少的神经参数达到最佳性能。报告三种互补相关性指标:日均、跨日累积与合并相关性,全面评估预测质量。结果表明,有效适配需精细融合神经与经典组件,后者起关键补充作用。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Foundation models for time series forecasting demonstrate impressive zero-shot generalization but often underperform on specialized domains such as high-frequency finance. We present a comprehensive study of hybrid neural-classical correction for adapting frozen TimesFM (200M parameters) to stock return prediction during the volatile opening trading hour. We compare two neural correction architectures - AttnCorrect (multi-head self-attention, approximately 471K parameters) and GatedLinear (low-rank bilinear projection with gating, approximately 49K parameters) - each augmented with Random Forest residual learning. Through systematic ablation across 10 major technology stocks (NVDA, MSFT, AAPL, GOOG, GOOGL, AMZN, META, AVGO, TSLA, NFLX) spanning 2 million data points, we reveal critical insights: (1) The hybrid neural-classical approach achieves 0.597 pooled correlation and 6.4x mean per-day correlation improvement over frozen TimesFM; (2) Classical residual learning (Random Forest) provides the largest single-component contribution, matching or exceeding the neural correction component; (3) Simpler neural architectures surprisingly outperform complex ones when classical residual learning is removed; (4) Self-attention provides the largest neural-only contribution. GatedLinear+RF achieves best overall performance with 9x fewer neural parameters than AttnCorrect+RF. We report three complementary correlation metrics - mean per-day, cross-day cumulative, and pooled - to provide a complete picture of predictive quality. Our results provide practical guidance: effective foundation model adaptation requires careful integration of neural and classical components, with classical methods playing a crucial complementary role.

时间序列股票预测模型融合冻结模型

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。