挪威新闻业用生成式AI办选举报道，结果陷入自毁循环。
The GenAI Catch-22: Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Norwegian Newsrooms During the 2025 Parliamentary Election
- 记者用AI写稿，反被工具削弱专业判断力
- 理想化技术能力导致对外服务计划失败
- 既怕出错又缺人手，形成无法破解的困局
生成式人工智能（GenAI）在新闻业的应用引发对新闻质量与民主功能的担忧。本文通过2025年挪威议会选举期间对新闻机构的十个月案例研究，基于对管理者与记者的访谈，分析宏大愿景如何在技术和实践挑战前受挫。研究指出，记者自身使用AI带来的内部风险，常被忽视，而管理者则抱有不切实际的乐观预期，误判技术发展速度与能力，导致面向公众的GenAI服务计划崩溃，转而采用更基础的内部工具。此外，新闻机构面临一种「生成式AI困境」：为监控AI防止错误与不当影响，依赖人类专业能力；但过度使用AI反而削弱了这种能力，使其无法有效监督系统，形成自我削弱的恶性循环。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The increasing use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in journalism raises concerns about possible detrimental effects both on journalism and its democratic function. We explore these risks through a case study of GenAI in Norwegian Newsrooms during the 2025 parliamentary election campaign. Based on interviews with managers and journalists over a ten-month period, we analyse how ambitious visions fared in the face of technological and practical challenges. We highlight the risk of an internal threat stemming from the journalists' own use of AI, contrasting the dominant focus on external disinformation threats. We show how newsroom managers shared sociotechnical imaginaries resulting in unrealistically optimistic beliefs about the capabilities of the technology and the pace of development, leading to plans for audience-facing GenAI services collapsing and giving way to more mundane uses of GenAI tools internally in the newsrooms. Furthermore, we identify a vulnerability in the newsroom's resilience against GenAI influence: a GenAI Catch-22. In order to monitor the GenAI tools and prevent errors and undue influence, newsrooms rely on human expertise. But by using GenAI extensively, the newsrooms risk a deterioration of human expertise, preventing them from monitoring the GenAI systems adequately.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。