分析红迪网性暴力幸存者叙事中的羞耻感与回应支持，揭示心理创伤如何影响表达与社群反应。
Stigma and Support in Online Sexual Violence Narratives on Reddit
- 构建SCOPE数据集，标注叙事中的四类羞耻感与评论中的五类支持
- 内部羞耻最普遍，且叙事中更强调内心痛苦而非事件解释
- 社群回应稳定，信息与尊重支持最常见，适合研究在线创伤支持机制
在线社区为性暴力幸存者提供了分享经历和寻求支持的空间。尽管已有研究分别探讨过羞耻感与社会支持，但两者在幸存者叙述中的关联仍不清晰。本文引入SCOPE数据集，将线上幸存者叙述中的羞耻信号与对应评论区的支持类型进行关联分析。通过多维度羞耻分类（遭遇性、内化性、预期性、结构性羞耻）与支持分类（信息支持、情感支持、尊重支持、具体帮助、群体互动），结合上下文、语言和情绪分析，发现含羞耻的叙述更强调内在痛苦，而无羞耻叙述则侧重情境解读。内化羞耻是最高频类别，且不同羞耻类型下社区回应整体保持稳定，其中信息支持与尊重支持最为常见。研究揭示了羞耻如何塑造幸存者叙事与同侪回应模式，对计算建模、内容审核及安全在线系统设计具有启示意义。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Online communities increasingly provide spaces where survivors of sexual violence can share their experiences and seek support. Although prior research has examined stigma and social support separately, less is known about how stigma expressed in survivor narratives relates to the support offered in response. We introduce the SCOPE dataset, linking stigma signals in online survivor narratives to support types in corresponding comment threads. We annotate posts using a multi-dimensional stigma taxonomy, including Experienced, Internalized, Anticipated, and Structural Stigma, and comments using a support taxonomy encompassing Information Support, Emotional Support, Esteem Support, Tangible Assistance, and Group Interaction. Using contextual, linguistic, and emotion analyses, we compare Stigma and No Stigma content and find that Stigma narratives place greater emphasis on internalized distress, whereas No Stigma narratives focus more on interpreting situations and experiences. Internalized Stigma is the most prevalent category, and community responses remain broadly stable across stigma types, with Information and Esteem Support appearing most often. These findings show how stigma shapes survivor narratives and peer responses and have implications for computational modeling, content moderation, and safer online systems.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。