arXiv:2608.12528eess.SYcs.RO2026-08被引 1

通过轨迹扩展度监督自校准,实现未知位姿传感器的闭环目标搜寻。

Excitation-Supervised Closed-Loop Self-Calibration and Target Seeking for an Unknown-Pose Range-Bearing Relay

  • 用轨迹扩展度作为激励预算,动态触发探索性运动。
  • 在噪声环境下有限时间内完成校准,成功率100%且航向误差<0.0191弧度。
  • 适合需自主校准与目标追踪的无人系统,如无人机或机器人导航。

一辆车辆通过位置和朝向未知的测距-测角中继寻找隐藏目标时,需在线判断自身运动是否已使中继校准可信,并在不可信时采取相应行动。已有研究指出两种相对观测可消除校准歧义,使目标信息全局可用,但该结论为静态分析,仅在数据存储后分类。本文引入闭环机制:揭示轨迹扩展度 $S_v$ 同时是有限噪声下的初始精度上限、局部向量方差分解指标及圆几何激励预算,并据此设计激励监督控制器。当扩展度不足时,算法重新触发探索运动,将目标搜寻指令偏离激励方向;否则进入无约束目标追踪。在明确采样假设下,监督规则可保证有限时间内获取所需激励;在无噪声局部区域且激励衰减为正时,估计器收敛后目标追踪亦收敛;阈值由期望校准精度决定,非启发式选取。闭环仿真、蒙特卡洛对比、扩展阈值消融实验以及带感知延迟的ROS 2/Gazebo软硬件在环实验验证了方法有效性。衰减率扫描显示:固定周期方案在激励衰减快于未知达标时间时失效——100次试验中航向均方根误差从0.010升至0.065弧度,成功率降至56%,而目标跟踪误差不变;监督策略则保持航向误差在0.0095至0.0191弧度间,成功率100%。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

A vehicle seeking a hidden target through a range-bearing relay of unknown position and yaw must decide, online, whether its own motion has already made the relay calibration trustworthy, and what to do when it has not. Two distinct vehicle-relative observations are known to remove the calibration gauge and make the target's relay-local packet globally actionable (arXiv:2608.09464), but that statement is static: it classifies a stored window only after the fact. This paper supplies the closed-loop layer: we show that the trajectory-spread margin $S_v$ that governs identifiability is simultaneously a finite-noise seed-accuracy bound, a local-vector variance decomposition, and a circle-geometry excitation budget, and we use it to supervise an excitation-reset controller. An excitation-supervised algorithm retriggers exploratory motion whenever the spread certificate is insufficient, projecting the target-seeking input away from the excitation's push, and otherwise proceeds to unrestricted target seeking. Under explicit sampling assumptions the supervision rule provably acquires any required excitation in finite time; in the noiseless local regime with positive excitation decay, estimator convergence yields target-seeking convergence after certification; and the threshold is selected from a desired calibration-accuracy level rather than chosen heuristically. Closed-loop simulation, paired Monte Carlo comparisons, a spread-threshold ablation, and a ROS 2/Gazebo software-in-the-loop experiment with sensing delay validate the approach. A decay-rate sweep shows that supervision matters when a fixed schedule's decay outruns the unknown time-to-adequate-excitation: over 100 paired trials the fixed baseline's yaw RMSE rises from 0.010 to 0.065 rad and success falls to 56%, while target-tracking error remains insensitive; supervision keeps yaw RMSE between 0.0095 and 0.0191 rad with 100% success.

目标追踪自校准闭环控制无人系统

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。