arXiv:2608.12827cs.CV2026-08

用手机拍照扫描身体,精度接近专业设备,适合孕期体型追踪。

Validation of Smartphone-Based Photogrammetric 3D Body Scanning for Automated Anthropometric Measurements Compared with a Commercial Depth-Sensor-Based Body Scanner

论文配图:Validation of Smartphone-Based Photogrammetric 3D Body Scanning for Automated Anthropometric Measurements Compared with a Commercial Depth-Sensor-Based Body Scanner
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 用手机拍摄+算法重建3D人体,自动提取四个部位周长。
  • 与商用扫描仪对比平均误差<16毫米,相关性超0.9,可监测孕期体型变化。
  • 适合医疗健康场景中低成本、长期跟踪身体形态的用户。

3D身体扫描因快速无创在医疗中日益重要。尽管手机摄影测量重建提供了低成本、易获取的替代方案,但其全身扫描性能仍缺乏充分验证。为此,我们设计研究,全面评估手机应用PolyCam在自动提取全身测量数据及纵向体形监测方面的表现,与商用深度传感器扫描仪Fit3D ProScanner对比,使用144名孕妇在孕期全程扫描的数据。我们设计了自动周长提取流程,从配对3D扫描中获取四个解剖学部位的测量值。采用线性混合效应模型评估扫描仪差异和纵向体形变化。通过重复扫描和刚性人台上的卷尺测量评估一致性。结果显示,PolyCam与Fit3D具有高度一致性:各部位平均偏差低于16毫米,组内相关系数高于0.8,皮尔逊相关系数高于0.9;两者均能捕捉相似的纵向体形变化。人台实验显示平均偏差低于3.5毫米,与卷尺测量无显著差异。这些发现支持手机摄影测量作为商业扫描仪的可行替代方案,适用于长期3D体形评估。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

3D body scanning has become an important tool in healthcare applications because of its rapid and non-invasive nature. While smartphone-based photogrammetric reconstruction provide a low-cost and accessible alternative to commercial 3D body scanners, their performance for whole-body scanning remains insufficiently validated. Thus, we designed this study to comprehensively validate the photogrammetric 3D scanning application by evaluating automatically extracted whole-body measurements and longitudinal body-shape monitoring. We evaluated a representative application, PolyCam, against the commercial depth-sensor-based Fit3D ProScanner using 144 pregnant participants scanned longitudinally throughout pregnancy. We designed an automatic circumference extraction pipeline to get measurements at four anatomical landmarks from paired 3D scans. A linear mixed-effects model was used to evaluate scanner effects and longitudinal body-shape changes. Measurement consistency was assessed using repeated PolyCam scans and tape measurements on a rigid mannequin. PolyCam demonstrated strong agreement with Fit3D, with average biases below 16 mm, intraclass correlation coefficients above 0.8, and Pearson correlation coefficients above 0.9 across all landmarks. Both systems captured comparable longitudinal body-shape changes. Mannequin experiments showed mean biases below 3.5 mm and no significant differences from tape measurements. These findings support smartphone photogrammetry as a potential accessible alternative to commercial body scanners and applicable for longitudinal 3D body-shape assessment.

3D扫描手机测量医疗应用纵向追踪

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。