arXiv:2608.14321cs.CV2026-08

用风险控制伪标签提升眼科OCT图像少样本分类精度

TRIAGE: Risk-Controlled Pseudo-Label Admission for Annotation-Efficient Semi-Supervised Retinal OCT Classification

论文配图:TRIAGE: Risk-Controlled Pseudo-Label Admission for Annotation-Efficient Semi-Supervised Retinal OCT Classification
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 引入患者级风险控制器,区分不同类型误判代价
  • 仅用20%标注数据达89.66%准确率,5%时仍保持76.88%精度
  • 适合医疗影像少标注场景,尤其适用于眼底OCT诊断

光学相干断层扫描(OCT)在眼科疾病诊断中应用广泛,但因专家标注成本高而难以实现自动化。半监督学习(SSL)可缓解标注不足问题,但现有伪标签生成方法多依赖预测置信度,未考虑不同错误类型的不对称性。本文提出TRIAGE框架,采用基于患者级的分层共形风险控制器与非对称代价矩阵,集成三模块:支持部分异常监督的分层分类器、具有原-对偶覆盖率控制的患者组共形风险控制器、以及用于跨切片验证的上下文感知Transformer教师。在诺尔眼科医院数据集(16,822个B-scan,161名患者,554个体积)上,使用仅20%标注数据时,扫描级准确率达89.66%,宏F1为0.8805,宏AUC为0.9641,误分级率为8.34%;仅5%标注数据时,准确率仍达76.88%,误分级率0.1656。相比六种先进半监督方法,性能显著更优,消融实验证明各模块贡献(相比固定阈值方法,误分级率降低42.7%)。在OCT-C8数据集上,1%标注数据下3类分类准确率达98.00%,10%标注数据下8类分类准确率达95.94%。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

The advanced retinal disease diagnosing imaging modality, optical coherence tomography (OCT), encounters a lack of automation because of the high expenses for annotations performed by specialists. The use of SSL solves the problem of insufficient annotations using unlabeled B-scans; however, most of the current techniques for generating pseudo-labels are based on prediction confidence without considering the asymmetry between different types of errors. This paper proposes TRIAGE, a risk-controlled semi-supervised framework for OCT scans classification, which uses the concept of a patient-level conformal risk controller with an asymmetric cost matrix. TRIAGE unites three crucial modules: a hierarchical classifier that is capable of working with partially abnormal supervision of the disease subtypes, a patient-grouped conformal risk controller with primal-dual coverage control, and a context-aware Transformer teacher for cross-slice verification. On the dataset from Noor Eye Hospital (16,822 B-scans, 161 patients, and 554 volumes) with a test set of unseen patients, TRIAGE demonstrates 89.66% scan-level accuracy, 0.8805 macro-F1, 0.9641 macro-AUC, and an 8.34% under-grading rate when using only 20% of the labeled data. With only 5% of the labeled data, TRIAGE keeps 76.88% accuracy and a 0.1656 under-grading rate. Compared with the other six state-of-the-art semi-supervised methods, TRIAGE significantly outperforms them with ablation study demonstrating the contribution of each module in the overall framework performance (by 42.7% in terms of under-grading rate comparing to fixed threshold methods). TRIAGE demonstrates 98.00% accuracy for 3-class classification with 1% labeled data and 95.94% accuracy for 8-class classification with 10% labeled data on the OCT-C8 dataset.

半监督学习OCT诊断风险控制少样本学习

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。