arXiv:2608.15266cs.GRcs.LG2026-08

用几何方法精简脑网络分析,高效识别疾病相关连接模式。

BrainLinear: A Linear Model for Brain Network Analysis in Sparse Tangent Subspaces

论文配图:BrainLinear: A Linear Model for Brain Network Analysis in Sparse Tangent Subspaces
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 将脑功能连接矩阵映射到共享切空间,保留关键差异方向
  • 仅选前K个最具判别力的方向,实现高精度分类
  • 计算量大幅降低,适合临床场景的可解释性分析

功能连接组分析通过研究脑区间相互作用来理解并识别自闭症谱系障碍和阿尔茨海默病等疾病。现有方法通常使用图神经网络(GNN)和变压器(Transformer)建模完整的功能连接矩阵,但处理数万条连接会引入冗余与噪声,增加计算开销,并限制连接层面的可解释性。这引发核心问题:是否真需复杂交互建模,还是仅识别少量疾病相关连接模式即可?为此,我们提出BrainLinear,一种轻量级、几何感知的框架,用于挖掘具有疾病判别性的连接组模式。BrainLinear首先将每个功能连接矩阵映射至训练集弗雷歇均值中心的共享切空间,捕捉个体差异的同时尊重矩阵几何结构;随后,根据分类贡献与病例-对照差异对每对脑区(ROI-pair)的切向方向进行评分,保留前Top-K方向作为紧凑表征;最后,通过浅层多层感知机完成分类。在ABIDE和ADNI数据集上的实验表明,BrainLinear以远低于基线的成本达到或超越强基线性能:在各项指标上,AUC与准确率(ACC)分别提升最多3.54和1.39个百分点,同时运行时间与峰值GPU内存分别减少84.0%和68.4%(相对于最优基线)。所选方向与组间位移方向一致,且按主要功能系统组织,支持连接层面的解释。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Functional connectome analysis examines brain-region interactions to understand and identify disorders such as autism spectrum disorder and Alzheimer's disease. Existing methods typically use GNNs and Transformers to model the full functional connectivity matrix. However, processing tens of thousands of connections introduces redundancy and noise, increases computational cost, and limits connection-level interpretability. This raises a central question: do we really need complex interaction modeling, or is identifying a small set of disease-relevant connectivity patterns sufficient? To answer this question, we propose BrainLinear, a lightweight geometry-aware framework for mining disease-discriminative connectome patterns. BrainLinear first maps each functional connectivity matrix to a shared tangent space centered at the Fréchet mean of the training set, capturing subject-specific deviations while respecting matrix geometry. It then scores each ROI-pair tangent direction by its classification contribution and disease--control difference, retaining Top-$K$ directions as a compact representation. Finally, a shallow multilayer perceptron performs classification on the selected representation. Experiments on ABIDE and ADNI show that BrainLinear matches or exceeds strong GNN and Transformer baselines at a fraction of their cost: it improves AUC and ACC over the best baseline for each metric by up to $3.54$ and $1.39$ percentage points, while reducing runtime and peak GPU memory by $84.0\%$ and $68.4\%$ relative to the closest baseline in AUC. The selected directions are directionally consistent with between-group displacements and organized across major functional systems, supporting connection-level interpretation.

脑网络分析几何建模可解释性轻量化

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。