融合心理机制的传播模型能更真实预测健康谣言在社交平台的扩散轨迹。
Integrating Persuasion Theory into the Epidemiological Modelling of Health Misinformation Spread on Social Media

- 构建六类人群的改进版流行病模型,加入心理因素动态调节传播率。
- 在新冠谣言数据上降低误差5.5%,推迟峰值至第160天,峰值上升至7%。
- 适合研究谣言传播、政策制定者及社交媒体治理者参考。
本研究提出一种融合流行病学与行为科学的混合框架,用于模拟社交平台上健康类虚假信息的传播。将经典SIR模型扩展为六类人群的SIRMMM模型,新增未被误导者(MS)、已被误导者(MI)和已恢复者(MR)以更准确反映虚假信息生命周期。进一步引入详尽可能性模型(ELM)的心理信号——情感极性、互动指标与认知投入——动态调节传播速率,形成ELM-SIRMMM模型。参数基于FibVID数据集(捕捉推特上的新冠谣言)估计,并在MC-Fake(情绪化谣言)和Monant(通用健康谣言)数据集上验证泛化能力。结果显示:在FibVID上,模型RMSE下降5.5%,谣言峰值从第150天延后至第160天,峰值占比由6%升至7%;在MC-Fake上,成功复现“闪传谣言”模式,第45天影响38%用户,97%实现恢复;而在单调的Monant数据中,仅带来3%峰值,57%用户仍易感。表明仅结构复杂不足以提升效果,真实动态需依赖随时间和情境变化的心理输入。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
This study presents a hybrid epidemiological and behavioural framework to simulate the spread of health misinformation on social media. We extend the classical Susceptible--Infected--Recovered (SIR) model to a six-compartment structure (SIRMMM), incorporating Misinformed Susceptible (MS), Misinformed Infected (MI), and Misinformed Recovered (MR) compartments to better reflect the dynamics of the misinformation lifecycle. To account for individual-level behavioural variation, we extend the SIRMMM model by integrating psychological signals from the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM), including sentiment polarity, engagement metrics, and cognitive effort, which dynamically modulate the misinformation transmission rate, yielding the ELM-SIRMMM framework. Model parameters were estimated using the FibVID dataset, which captures COVID-19 misinformation on Twitter. Generalisability was tested on two additional datasets: MC-Fake (emotional misinformation) and Monant (general health misinformation). Results show that the ELM-SIRMMM model enhances both predictive accuracy and dynamic realism. On FibVID, it decreases RMSE by 5.5%, delays the misinformation peak from day 150 to day 160, and increases its peak prevalence from 6% to 7%. On MC-Fake, it accurately reproduces a flash-rumour pattern, infecting 38% of users by day 45 and achieving 97% misinformation recovery, all while maintaining model accuracy. In contrast, minimal behavioural signal variability in the Monant dataset leads to marginal benefit, with only a 3% peak and 57% of users remaining susceptible. These findings suggest that structural elaboration alone is insufficient. Functional realism in modelling misinformation spread requires dynamic psychological inputs that vary meaningfully across time and contexts.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。