arXiv:2608.15713cs.CV2026-08

针对路面损伤检测,提出新架构提升大目标识别精度与推理速度。

YOLO26-RD: An End-to-End Road Damage Detection Network With Learnable Contrast Enhancement and Edge-Guided Downsampling

论文配图:YOLO26-RD: An End-to-End Road Damage Detection Network With Learnable Contrast Enhancement and Edge-Guided Downsampling
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 重构检测头分配,用可学习对比增强和边缘引导下采样优化特征提取
  • 在多尺度测试中平均达到0.790 mAP50,优于现有YOLO系列模型
  • 推理速度达98帧/秒,适合车载实时检测场景

传统路面损伤检测器专为小目标设计,通常采用步幅4的检测头并以空间到深度下采样替代卷积。本文基于区域级调查图像的标注几何结构检验该假设,发现其不成立:在640分辨率下仅有1.28%的实例为小目标,70.37%为大目标,但步幅4层级会占据75.3%的锚框,且基线失败主要表现为漏检而非定位错误。因此,YOLO26-RD重新分配锚框预算,保留步幅4分支作为颈部特征但不用于检测,并引入可学习对比增强(每块494参数,从检测损失中学习,推理时激活)和边缘引导空间到深度下采样(EdgeSPD,基于固定Sobel先验门控,无损)。在统一训练配方下,共训练15个模型(每家族五尺度),包括YOLO26-RD、YOLO26和YOLOv12。平均来看,YOLO26-RD在mAP50和mAP50-95上分别为0.790和0.482,优于YOLO26(0.776, 0.471)和YOLOv12(0.755, 0.468);在所有尺度上均超越两者,十二组对比无一例外。其中,YOLO26-RD-l在多尺度表现最佳,达0.809 mAP50和0.497 mAP50-95,分别比基准提升0.031和0.030,且各项分类指标均领先。模块消融实验显示所有组件改进均优于基准。性能优势源于架构设计,非单一配置所致;虽三处提升接近数据集0.015分辨率极限,但验证集在尺度x上重现了与YOLO26的排序,但未重现与YOLOv12的排序。释放的TensorRT FP16模型在入门级加速器上实现98帧/秒,远超100公里/小时所需21帧/秒。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Pavement distress detectors are conventionally specialised for small objects, typically by adding a stride-4 detection head and replacing strided convolution with space-to-depth downsampling. This paper tests that premise against the annotation geometry of region level survey imagery and finds it fails: 1.28% of instances are small at 640 resolution while 70.37% are large, yet a stride-4 level would claim 75.3% of anchors, and complete misses rather than localisation errors dominate baseline failures. YOLO26-RD therefore reallocates the anchor budget, retaining the stride-4 branch as neck features but carrying no detection level there, and adds LearnableContrast, a 494 parameter per tile correction learned from the detection loss and active at inference, and EdgeSPD, a lossless space-to-depth downsampler gated by a fixed Sobel prior. Fifteen models were trained from scratch under one recipe, five scales each of YOLO26-RD and of matched YOLO26 and YOLOv12 families. Averaged over scales YOLO26-RD returns 0.790 mAP50 and 0.482 mAP50-95 against 0.776 and 0.471 for YOLO26 and 0.755 and 0.468 for YOLOv12; it exceeds both on mAP50 at every scale from s upward, and at m, l and x it leads on both metrics, twelve pairwise comparisons decided without exception. YOLO26-RD-l is the best of the fifteen at 0.809 mAP50 and 0.497 mAP50-95, improving on the YOLO26 reference by 0.031 and 0.030 and leading all six per class entries; every arm of a module ablation also exceeds that reference. The margin is thus a property of the architecture rather than of one tuned configuration, though three of the twelve margins lie inside the dataset 0.015 resolution limit and the held out split reproduces the ordering against YOLO26 but not YOLOv12 at scale x. As a TensorRT FP16 engine the released model sustains 98 frames per second on an entry level accelerator, against the 21 needed at 100 km/h.

目标检测路面损伤实时推理YOLO

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。