arXiv:2608.16080cs.LGphysics.data-an2026-08

用自改进框架提升3D芯片热优化模型精度与速度,比传统方法快56倍且误差极低。

DeepOHeat-v2: Self-Improving Operator Learning for Fast and Trustworthy Thermal Optimization in 3D-IC Design

论文配图:DeepOHeat-v2: Self-Improving Operator Learning for Fast and Trustworthy Thermal Optimization in 3D-IC Design
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 基于离散物理损失处理材料界面不连续性,降低优化难度
  • 自改进机制通过真实求解器反馈持续优化模型,峰值温差降至0.11K
  • 适合需要快速高精度热设计的集成电路开发者

多芯片3D集成电路的热感知优化需评估大量设计,每次计算都需昂贵的热方程求解。基于算子学习的代理模型可替代求解,理想情况是仅凭物理规律训练,无需标注数据。DeepOHeat-v1虽实现快速可靠,但仅适用于低对比度结构;高对比度多芯片堆叠导致两个问题:材料界面处导热率突变使连续物理损失定义不清,且离散强形式损失条件数κ₂(Aₕ)≈6×10⁴,超出一阶优化能力。本文提出DeepOHeat-v2解决上述问题:首先,采用能原生处理不连续性的离散物理损失,其能量形式将预测空间损失海森条件数从κ²降至κ,配合矩阵预处理优化器,平均峰值温度误差由超30K降至0.55K;其次,因优化过程会偏离训练分布,提出自改进框架:热点信任门将异常布局发送至参考求解器,代理模型基于修正解增量训练,仅当验证误差下降时才更新。在多芯片基准测试中,返回设计的代理-真实峰值温差从1.12K降至0.11K,媲美每步求解的优化器,但运行速度提升56倍。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Thermal-aware optimization of multi-die 3D integrated circuits evaluates many designs, each a costly heat-equation solve. Operator-learning surrogates replace this solve with a fast forward pass, ideally trained from physics alone, without labeled data. DeepOHeat-v1 made such surrogates fast and trustworthy, but only on low-contrast geometries. High-contrast multi-die stacks break it in two ways: discontinuous conductivities make the continuous physics loss ill-defined at material interfaces, and ill-conditioning ($κ_2(A_h) \approx 6 \times 10^4$) puts the discretized strong-form loss beyond first-order optimization. We propose DeepOHeat-v2 to overcome both. First, we train on a discretized physics loss that handles the discontinuities natively; its energy form reduces the prediction-space loss-Hessian conditioning from $κ^2$ to $κ$, and a matrix-preconditioned optimizer cuts the mean peak temperature error from over 30 K to 0.55 K. Second, because optimization leaves the training distribution, we propose a self-improving framework: a hotspot trust gate sends flagged placements to a reference solver, and the surrogate incrementally retrains on the refined solutions, keeping an update only when it improves held-out validation error. On a multi-die benchmark, the surrogate-true peak gap on the returned design falls from 1.12 K to 0.11 K, matching a solve-at-every-step optimizer while running $56\times$ faster.

热优化算子学习3DIC自改进

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。