用低成本解析模型提升声学共振器预测的数据效率,稀疏仿真数据下仍保持高精度。
A Data-Efficient Analytical Prior Machine Learning Framework for Sound Reduction Frequency Prediction in Helmholtz Resonators
- 用解析模型生成先验,再结合少量仿真数据校准,提升预测精度。
- 在仅20~70组仿真数据下,误差降低至0.371 Hz,比纯数据方法低超50%。
- 适合仿真成本高、数据稀缺的工程优化场景,如降噪结构设计。
高保真有限元仿真可准确预测侧支共振器性能,但生成大规模仿真数据代价高昂;纯数据驱动模型在数据稀缺时可靠性下降。本文提出一种融合解析先验的学习框架,在有限高保真仿真预算下提升数据效率。当推理时仍可访问解析模型时,将其作为基准,仅学习解析与仿真之间的偏差;若需自包含预测器,则先将大量低成本解析结果中提炼出解析映射作为学习先验,再用少量仿真数据校准。在86个仿真标注的矩形侧支赫姆霍兹共振器几何上评估,解析模型平均绝对误差(MAE)为1.333 Hz。直接支持向量回归(SVR)达3.375 Hz,残差SVR降至0.426 Hz;直接多层感知机(MLP)为1.109 Hz,解析先验预训练后降至0.556 Hz(冻结先验残差适配)和0.371 Hz(全模型微调)。在20至70组仿真数据训练下,解析修正与解析先验预训练均显著优于直接学习。结果表明,解析先验信息可在仿真数据稀缺时大幅提升高保真预测能力,显式修正与先验蒸馏满足不同部署需求。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
High-fidelity finite-element simulations can provide accurate numerical predictions for side-branch resonators, but large simulation datasets are expensive to generate and purely data-driven surrogates may become unreliable when simulation-labelled data are scarce. This study develops an analytical-prior learning framework that reuses a low-cost analytical model to improve data efficiency under limited high-fidelity simulation budgets. Two complementary routes are considered. When the analytical model remains available at inference, it is retained as an explicit baseline and the simulation data are used to learn only the analytical-to-simulation discrepancy. When a self-contained predictor is required, the analytical mapping is first distilled from abundant low-cost evaluations into a learned prior and then calibrated with the limited simulation data. The framework is evaluated on rectangular side-branch Helmholtz resonators using 86 simulation-labelled geometries and 8,998 non-overlapping analytical-only geometries. The analytical model achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.333 Hz. Direct support vector regression (SVR) achieved 3.375 Hz, while residual SVR reduced the MAE to 0.426 Hz. A direct multilayer perceptron (MLP) achieved 1.109 Hz, whereas analytical-prior pretraining reduced the error to 0.556 Hz with frozen-prior residual adaptation and 0.371 Hz with full-model fine-tuning. Across training budgets of 20 to 70 simulation-labelled cases, both analytical correction and analytical-prior pretraining consistently improved data efficiency relative to direct learning. These results show that analytical prior information can substantially improve high-fidelity prediction when simulation data are scarce, with explicit correction and prior distillation serving complementary deployment needs.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。