构建首个真实部署条件下的开放词汇单目3D检测诊断基准
OV3D-Bench: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Open-Vocabulary Monocular 3D Detection

- 用数据集级提示替代每图类别真值,分离定位、语义鲁棒性与跨域迁移能力
- 发现模型定位准但常误判类别,且对提示词敏感(性能差至1/3)
- 提醒研究者警惕目标感知协议掩盖问题,适合关注开放词汇检测的开发者
开放词汇单目3D检测器在特定场景下表现良好,但评估方式各异,部分依赖部署时不可用的每图类别真值,且将几何与语义统一为单一AP指标。为此,我们提出OV3D-Bench,一个在七组室内外数据集上,模拟真实部署条件的诊断基准。该基准以测试时的数据集级类别提示替代每图类别真值,并将检测精度解耦为三个维度:定位、语义鲁棒性与跨域迁移。我们评估了七种代表性检测器,发现:(i) 模型定位效果良好,但常将正确框误标为语义相近类别;(ii) 准确率对提示词高度敏感(如WildDet3D在使用‘一张详细的高分辨率汽车照片’提示时,AP从18.6降至5.4);(iii) 广泛采用的目标感知协议会掩盖这些缺陷(如使DetAny3D在ScanNet上的AP被虚增1.9倍)。最后,我们展示仅通过对比视觉语言编码器SigLIPv2重映射冻结的封闭词汇检测器输出,即可媲美近期专门设计的开放词汇方法。这表明几何定位已较成熟,而开放词汇语义仍是主要瓶颈。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Open-vocabulary monocular 3D detectors report strong in-domain performance, but each evaluates under a different protocol, several rely on per-image category oracles unavailable at deployment, and all collapse geometry and semantics into a single AP metric. To address this, we introduce OV3D-Bench, a diagnostic benchmark that compares open-vocabulary monocular 3D detectors under deployment-realistic conditions across seven indoor and outdoor datasets. Our benchmark replaces the per-image class name oracle with test-time dataset-level class name prompts, and decouples detection accuracy along three axes: localization, semantic robustness, and cross-domain transfer. We evaluate seven representative detectors and find that (i) they localize objects well yet often mislabel a correctly localized box as a semantically adjacent category; (ii) accuracy is highly sensitive to prompt phrasing (e.g. WildDet3D's performance collapses from 18.6 to 5.4 AP when prompted with "a detailed high-resolution photo of a car" rather than "car"); and (iii) the widely adopted target-aware protocol hides these errors (e.g. inflating DetAny3D's AP by 1.9 $\times$ on ScanNet). Lastly, we demonstrate that simply remapping a frozen closed-vocabulary detector's predictions using a contrastive vision-language encoder such as SigLIPv2 performs competitively against recent purpose-built open-vocabulary methods. This indicates that geometric localization is more mature, while open-vocabulary semantics remains the primary bottleneck.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。