arXiv:2608.18103cs.CLcs.AI2026-08

用多专家智能体解析中药方剂机制,融合中医理论与现代科学。

DeepTCM1.0: A Multi-Expert AI Agent for Deciphering Mechanisms of Chinese Herbal Formulae Based on General Large Language Models

  • 构建三层次协作框架,模拟11个跨学科智能体协同分析。
  • 对桂枝汤的机制解析通过双盲五维评分验证,可靠性高。
  • 适合中医药现代化研究者、AI辅助药物研发团队使用。

背景:传统中药复方机制解析仍是中医药现代化的核心挑战。现有方法如数据挖掘和网络药理学难以实现经典中医理论与现代科研的深度整合。此外,通用大模型直接问答受限于中医理论适配性不足及推理幻觉问题。因此亟需发展符合中医整体观的智能分析方法。目标:建立融合经典中医理论与现代生命科学的多专家智能代理框架,实现中药复方机制的系统化、可解释性分析,并以桂枝汤为典型验证案例。方法:基于通用大模型DeepSeek V3.2构建DeepTCM1.0框架,采用三层协作架构与三轮迭代质控流程,模拟11个跨学科智能体的协同分析过程。从经典中医理论与现代科学研究双重视角,解析桂枝汤作用机制。通过双盲五维评分、组内相关系数(ICC)信度检验、曼-惠特尼U检验及效应量分析,综合评估框架性能。评估使用四个独立大模型作为评阅者,每份报告重复评分五轮,共产生100次独立评分。结果表明该框架具有高一致性和可靠性。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Background: Mechanistic elucidation of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) compound formulas remains a central challenge in the modernization of TCM. Conventional approaches, including data mining and network pharmacology, are insufficient for achieving deep integration between classical TCM theory and modern scientific research. In addition, direct question-answering using general-purpose artificial intelligence large language models is limited by inadequate adaptation to TCM theoretical frameworks and susceptibility to reasoning hallucinations. Consequently, there is an urgent need to develop intelligent analytical methods aligned with the holistic principles of TCM. Objective: To establish a multi-expert intelligent agent framework integrating classical TCM theory with modern life sciences, thereby enabling systematic and interpretable mechanistic analysis of TCM compound formulas, with Guizhi Decoction serving as a representative validation case. Methods: The DeepTCM1.0 framework was constructed based on the general-purpose large language model DeepSeek V3.2. It adopts a three-tier collaborative architecture and a three-round iterative quality-control workflow, simulating the collaborative analytical process of 11 interdisciplinary intelligent agents. The framework was applied to the mechanistic interpretation of Guizhi Decoction from the dual perspectives of classical traditional Chinese medicine theory and modern scientific research. Framework performance was comprehensively evaluated through double-blind five-dimensional scoring, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reliability testing, Mann-Whitney U tests, and effect size analysis. The evaluation employed four independent large language models as evaluators, each conducting five rounds of repeated scoring on five anonymized reports, resulting in a total of 100 independent scoring assessments.

中药智能

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。