arXiv:2608.18555cs.LGcs.AI2026-08

针对物联网中MLaaS性能漂移难题,提出可自适应检测的新框架。

Performance Drift Detection in Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) for IoT Environments

论文配图:Performance Drift Detection in Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) for IoT Environments
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 从输入输出学习服务行为,识别影响预测的关键特征
  • 相比基线方法准确率提升22-25%,误检率降低约9%
  • 根据变化动态调整检测频率,适合黑箱使用场景

机器学习即服务(MLaaS)是物联网环境中实现数据驱动智能应用的有力云范式,广泛应用于医疗、智能家居和工业领域,具有成本效益。然而,物联网环境的动态性常导致数据分布变化,影响MLaaS稳定性,而周期性更新进一步引入性能漂移。与传统ML系统不同,MLaaS客户端作为黑箱用户无法访问内部数据或参数,使得漂移检测尤为困难。为此,本文提出一种面向物联网环境的MLaaS性能漂移检测框架。该框架首先采用MLaaS提取模型,从输入输出对中学习服务行为并识别影响预测的特征。在此基础上,提出的MPDD模型联合捕捉输入数据与MLaaS行为的变化。我们进一步设计了自适应时间性能漂移检测机制(APDDM),根据行为与数据变化动态调整监控频率,实现及时漂移检测以支持有效服务管理。在真实数据集上的大量实验表明,MPDD相比基线方法准确率提升22-25%;APDDM平均准确率提升约4%,误检率降低约9%。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) is a powerful cloud paradigm enabling data-driven intelligent applications in Internet of Things (IoT) environments, widely adopted across healthcare, smart homes, and industry due to its cost-effectiveness. However, the dynamic nature of IoT frequently alters data distributions, affecting MLaaS stability, while periodic MLaaS updates further introduce performance drift. Unlike traditional ML systems, MLaaS clients operate as black-box users without access to internal data or parameters, making drift detection particularly challenging. To address this, we propose a novel MLaaS Performance Drift Detection framework for IoT environments. The framework first employs an MLaaS extraction model that learns service behavior from input-output pairs and identifies prediction-influenced features. Building on this, the proposed MLaaS Performance Drift Detection (MPDD) model jointly captures variations in input data and MLaaS behavior. We further design an Adaptive-Temporal Performance Drift Detection Mechanism (APDDM) that dynamically adjusts monitoring frequency based on behavioral and data variations, enabling timely drift detection for effective service management. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate that MPDD achieves up to 22-25% accuracy improvement over baseline drift detection methods. APDDM provides an average accuracy gain of approximately 4% and reduces the miss detection rate by around 9% compared to fixed-interval monitoring.

MLaaS性能漂移物联网自适应检测

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。