arXiv:2608.20608cs.CV2026-08

构建葡萄叶病害识别数据集基准,揭示真实场景下模型性能瓶颈

A Dataset-Centric Benchmark of Deep Learning Methods for Grape Leaf Disease Classification and Detection

论文配图:A Dataset-Centric Benchmark of Deep Learning Methods for Grape Leaf Disease Classification and Detection
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 基于多源数据集对比分析,评估分类与检测模型在不同条件下的表现
  • 真实复杂场景下分类准确率下降,目标检测性能在标注差异下波动显著
  • 适合农业视觉研究者、深度学习应用开发者参考真实数据挑战

葡萄叶病害识别对精准农业至关重要,可实现早期诊断、及时干预和优化管理。尽管深度学习已取得显著成果,但多数研究依赖少量受控条件下采集的数据集,难以反映田间复杂背景、光照变化、遮挡、叶片姿态、病害严重程度及设备差异等实际挑战。本文构建了一个以数据集为中心的深度学习方法基准,分析公开数据集在病害类别、标注类型、采集条件、图像特征、类别分布、来源及任务适配性方面的差异。评估代表性模型在图像级分类、区域级分类和目标检测三种设置下的表现:分类使用准确率,检测采用mAP@50和mAP@50:95。跨数据集实验进一步考察具有相似病害标签但视觉与标注特性不同的数据间的迁移能力。结果显示,在部分受控或衍生数据集上分类性能接近饱和,而在异构数据集上难度显著增加,检测性能在不同标注设置下差异明显。跨数据集性能大幅下降,尤其在目标检测任务中,表明相同病害标签并不等同于等效识别任务。该基准强调数据来源真实性、田间环境评估、标注一致性及外部验证对可靠病害识别的重要性。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Grape leaf disease recognition is important for precision agriculture, enabling early diagnosis, timely intervention, and improved vineyard management. Although deep learning has achieved strong results, many studies rely on few datasets, often acquired under controlled conditions, and may not reflect real vineyard challenges such as complex backgrounds, variable illumination, occlusion, leaf pose, disease severity, and device differences. This paper presents a dataset-centric benchmark of deep learning methods for grape leaf disease classification and detection. We analyze publicly available datasets in terms of disease categories, annotation types, acquisition conditions, image characteristics, class distributions, provenance, and task suitability. Representative models are evaluated in three settings: image-level classification, region-level classification, and object detection. Classification is assessed using accuracy, while detection is evaluated using mAP@50 and mAP@50:95. Cross-dataset experiments further examine transfer between datasets with compatible disease categories but different visual and annotation characteristics. Results show near-saturated classification performance on several controlled or derivative datasets, greater difficulty on heterogeneous datasets, and substantial variation in detection performance across annotation settings. Cross-dataset performance drops sharply, especially for object detection, indicating that shared disease labels do not necessarily define equivalent recognition tasks. The benchmark emphasizes dataset provenance, realistic field evaluation, annotation compatibility, and external validation for reliable vineyard disease recognition.

农业视觉病害识别数据基准目标检测

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。