用可执行技能库让机器人团队协作更安全可靠
Physical Agentic AI: An Architecture for Orchestrating a Robot Crew with LLMs

- 每个机器人提供可验证的技能清单,由大模型规划任务并分配
- 实测中错误调度率从23%-29%降至0%,动作前全检防出错
- 适合需要多机协同且安全要求高的真实物理场景
传统代理式AI虽能分解复杂任务,但在物理执行中仍常出现不可行、误时或危险动作。本文提出物理代理式AI框架,通过为每个机器人构建类型化的可执行技能库,由基础模型规划任务阶段并指派至对应机器人-技能对。一个非执行的使命规划器通过机器人编排层获取技能库、状态、位置及流程合约信息,而确定性机器人编排器则逐个验证并授权动作。在无人机-地面机器人搜救任务中,所有实验均在Gazebo中实时执行;另在人形与四足机器人搬运任务中,使用硬件等效接口及两轮实物测试(Unitree G1和Go2)。独立测试规划器知识与运行时强制机制发现:检索提升技能对齐度至96%(原51%),但仍有23%-29%步骤存在故障;每步调度前强制验证使故障调度归零,无误阻拦;持计划消融实验表明,关键在于编排门控而非计划差异。实时执行对比显示:无验证时8个注入故障全部越过编排边界,6个引发机器人运动;有验证时8个故障均被拒之于运动前。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Agentic AI frameworks interpret open-ended task goals and decompose them into multi-step plans. Richer information about embodiment-specific capabilities, physical preconditions, and cross-robot coordination improves grounding, but does not eliminate infeasible, mistimed, or unsafe physical actions. Physical robot crews therefore require an explicit architectural interface between semantic planning and execution, where every planned action is verified against robot capabilities, system state, and workflow constraints before actuation. This paper introduces Physical Agentic AI, a framework for skill-grounded robot agent orchestration, in which each robot exposes a typed library of executable skills while a foundation model planner decomposes a task into phases and assigns each phase to a robot-skill pair. A Robot Orchestration layer exposes the skill library, robot state, named locations, and workflow contracts to a non-actuating Mission Planner, while a deterministic Robot Orchestrator validates and authorizes one skill at a time. We evaluate on a drone-UGV search-and-dispatch mission, where every mission in every condition is executed live in Gazebo, and on a humanoid-quadruped transportation task using hardware-equivalent skill interfaces plus two physical trials on a Unitree G1 and Go2. Varying planner knowledge and runtime enforcement independently, we find that retrieval raises skill grounding from 51% to 96% yet leaves informed planners dispatching 23-29% of faulted steps. Per-dispatch enforcement reduces false dispatch to 0% with no false blocks, and a held-plan ablation confirms that the gate, not plan variation, is responsible. Live execution makes the difference physical: without enforcement all eight injected faults crossed the orchestration boundary and six produced robot motion; with enforcement all eight were refused before motion.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。