arXiv:2608.23726eess.SYcs.LG2026-08

通过分阶段检测与分类,提升电力线路故障识别准确率。

A Hybrid Two-Stage Machine Learning Pipeline for Fault Detection and Classification in Power Transmission Systems

  • 先用异常检测筛选故障,再用随机森林分类,避免单模型误判。
  • 在真实数据集上将故障识别准确率从31.3%提升至95.8%。
  • 适用于电力系统安全监控,尤其对难区分的三相故障有效。

高压输电网络中快速准确地检测故障对电网可靠性与设备保护至关重要。输电故障数据常存在类别不平衡问题,且某些故障的电气特征位于正常运行范围内,导致单一模型分类器在关键场景下失效。本文提出一种混合两阶段机器学习流程,将故障检测与分类解耦:第一阶段结合孤立森林异常检测器与可选的监督二分类器,通过或门融合策略自动分配监督分支;第二阶段仅对第一阶段标记的样本使用随机森林多分类器。特征工程采用每测量点的算子映射,将六路原始信号转换为十八个特征,包含由福雷斯特克定理导出的零序对称分量,共生成18L个特征(L为测量点数)。在TLFaultDataset上,该流程将线路故障端到端准确率从31.3%提升至95.8%。在独立单点数据集上,框架实现所有类别(含正常运行)97.25%的端到端准确率,超越94.84%的联邦基准,且无需GPU或联邦架构,单样本处理耗时仅0.05毫秒(CPU)。消融实验表明,零序特征解决了三相与三相接地故障的混淆问题,使该类对的F1分数从0.39提升至0.997。零序特征方向被发现具有系统依赖性,提示应采用学习型决策边界替代固定继电器阈值。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Rapid and accurate fault detection in high-voltage transmission networks is essential for grid reliability and equipment protection. Transmission fault datasets are frequently imbalanced, and certain fault types produce electrical signatures that fall within the normal operating envelope, causing single-model classifiers to fail on safety-critical cases. This paper proposes a hybrid two-stage machine learning pipeline that decouples detection from classification. Stage 1 combines an Isolation Forest anomaly detector with an optional supervised binary detector through an OR-fusion rule; the supervised branch is allocated automatically during training for any fault class the anomaly detector cannot resolve, and is omitted when no such class exists. Stage 2 applies a Random Forest multiclass classifier only to samples flagged by Stage 1. Feature engineering is expressed as a per-measurement-point operator mapping six raw channels to eighteen features, including zero-sequence symmetrical components derived from Fortescue's theorem, yielding 18L features for L measurement points. On the TLFaultDataset, the pipeline raises Line-fault end-to-end accuracy from 31.3% to 95.8%. On an independent single-point dataset, the same framework attains 97.25% end-to-end accuracy across all classes including normal operation, exceeding the TLFed federated benchmark of 94.84% without GPU or federated infrastructure, at 0.05 ms per sample on CPU. Ablation on both datasets shows zero-sequence features resolving the three-phase versus three-phase-to-ground ambiguity, raising the F1-score of that class pair from 0.39 to 0.997. The direction of the zero-sequence signature is found to be system-dependent, motivating a learned decision boundary in place of a fixed relay threshold.

故障检测电力系统机器学习零序特征

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。