arXiv:2608.25625cs.IR2026-08中稿 · EMNLP

根据查询内容动态选择最优检索管道,兼顾速度与准确率。

RetrievalRouter: Joint Modality and Architecture Selection for Document Retrieval

论文配图:RetrievalRouter: Joint Modality and Architecture Selection for Document Retrieval
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 用查询文本驱动轻量级路由模型,自动选最佳模态与架构
  • 比最优静态方案快12.4倍且高出2.5%准确率
  • 适合需要灵活响应的金融、医疗等高风险场景

文档检索在金融、医疗和法律等领域支撑关键信息获取。现代检索流程在模态(文本或跨模态)与架构(稠密或晚期交互)上差异显著,但存在固有权衡:最有效的流程过慢且昂贵,无法规模化;最快的方法则难以从复杂文档中提取证据。从业者不得不在漏检与不可用延迟间二选一,缺乏按查询动态调整的依据。本文证明这种权衡可避免。并非所有查询都需相同流程。在涵盖金融与科学语料库的多个基准上,不存在统一最优静态流程。我们提出RetrievalRouter,一种轻量级查询感知路由器,仅凭查询文本学习最适合该查询的检索流程。一个可调参数即可覆盖完整的精度-延迟权衡曲线;对每个静态基线,RetrievalRouter均能提供更准确且更快的运行点。相较最优静态基线,其准确率提升2.5%,速度提升12.4倍。相比已有自适应策略选择方法,RetrievalRouter在以精度为导向的设置下取得更高nDCG@5,而在以延迟为导向的设置下,表现相当甚至更优。代码与数据见https://github.com/emrekuruu/retrieval-router。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Document retrieval increasingly supports high-stakes information access in finance, healthcare, and law. Modern retrieval pipelines vary both in modality (text or multimodal) and in retrieval architecture (dense or late-interaction). These choices impose a hard compromise: the most effective pipelines are too slow and expensive to run at scale, while the fastest fail to retrieve evidence from complex documents. Practitioners must therefore choose between missed evidence and unusable latency, with no principled basis for adapting that choice at the query level. We show that this compromise is unnecessary. Not every query requires the same pipeline. Across benchmarks spanning financial and scientific corpora, no static pipeline dominates. We introduce RetrievalRouter, a lightweight query-aware router that learns, from the query text alone, which retrieval pipeline best fits each query. A single tunable parameter exposes the full accuracy-latency frontier, and for every static baseline, RetrievalRouter offers an operating point that is simultaneously more accurate and faster. Against the best static baseline, RetrievalRouter is 2.5% more accurate and 12.4 times faster. Furthermore, compared with prior adaptive strategy selection methods, RetrievalRouter achieves significantly higher nDCG@5 across accuracy-oriented settings, while matching or numerically outperforming them on both nDCG@5 and latency in latency-oriented settings. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/emrekuruu/retrieval-router.

文档检索动态路由多模态效率优化

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。