arXiv:2608.26107cs.AI2026-08

用符号推理提升在线学习风险预测的早期发现与可解释性

EduRiskX: A Neuro-Symbolic Framework with F-Logic Reasoning for Early Academic Risk Prediction

论文配图:EduRiskX: A Neuro-Symbolic Framework with F-Logic Reasoning for Early Academic Risk Prediction
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 结合时序注意力与F-Logic规则,融合神经网络与教育理论
  • 在第9.32周平均提前预警,准确率90.0%,检测率达94.3%
  • 提供可读的规则解释,适合教育管理者和教学设计者使用

在线教育中预测学生学术风险对及时干预、提升留任率和学习成效至关重要。现有模型普遍存在早期识别能力弱、可解释性差的问题,导致“黑箱”信任危机,难以在真实教学场景中应用。为此,我们提出EduRiskX,一种融合时序Transformer预测器与F-Logic符号推理的神经符号框架。神经部分通过时间注意力、类别加权损失和动态周截断建模学生长期行为序列;符号部分基于教育理论(参与度理论与学生融入模型)从训练数据构建规则库,模拟教师诊断逻辑。两者通过逻辑回归融合机制整合风险概率与置信度。在开放大学学习分析数据集(OULAD)上,采用严格的80/10/10学生级划分,EduRiskX在学期末(第38周)实现0.900的准确率和0.894的F1分数,平均提前9.32周检测,检测率达94.3%。相比SOTA时序模型(PatchTST、iTransformer)和主流深度学习基线(LSTM、CNN),EduRiskX在相同条件下具备更高召回率与更早风险识别能力。此外,F-Logic模块提供结构化规则解释,将预测与可观测行为模式及教育理论关联。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Predicting students' academic risk in online education is crucial for enabling timely interventions that can improve retention and learning outcomes. However, existing models often suffer from limited early detection capability and insufficient interpretability, leading to a "black-box" trust crisis that hinders their adoption in real-world pedagogical settings. To address these challenges, we propose EduRiskX, a neuro-symbolic framework that integrates a temporal Transformer-based predictor with F-Logic symbolic reasoning. The neural component models longitudinal student activity sequences using temporal attention, class-weighted loss, and dynamic weekly truncation. Acting as a data-driven expert system, an F-Logic rule base -- grounded in established educational theories (Engagement Theory and Student Integration Model) to mimic the diagnostic logic of human educators -- is constructed exclusively from the training data. The neural risk probability and the symbolic confidence score are then combined through a logistic regression-based fusion mechanism that learns the relative contribution of each signal. Experiments on the Open University Learning Analytics Dataset (OULAD) using a strict 80/10/10 student-level split show that EduRiskX achieves an accuracy of 0.900 and an F1-score of 0.894 at the end of the semester (Week 38), with an average early detection week of 9.32 and a detection rate of 94.30 percent. Compared with state-of-the-art time-series models (PatchTST, iTransformer) and common deep learning baselines (LSTM, CNN), EduRiskX yields improved recall and earlier risk identification under identical conditions. Beyond predictive performance, the F-Logic module provides structured rule-based explanations linking predictions to observable behavioral patterns and educational theories.

风险预测神经符号教育科技

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。