arXiv:2608.26515cs.ITcs.LG2026-08

提出无限记忆逻辑预测的极小极大后悔率精确刻画方法。

Sharp Minimax Regret for Infinite-Memory Logistic Prediction

  • 基于局部贝叶斯混合构造上界,匹配谱尺度
  • 在指数与多项式衰减下,证明下界与上界同阶
  • 适合研究在线预测中长程依赖的理论分析者

我们研究具有无限输入记忆的有限字母、外生驱动源的在线预测问题。独立 Rademacher 输入 $(U_t)$ 逐次观测,下一二元标记的 logit 为 $\sum_{j=1}^{t}θ_jU_{t+1-j}$,其中 $\abs{θ_j}\leq r_j$ 且 $\sum_jr_j\leq B$。后悔定义为期望累积超额对数损失。滞后 $j$ 的影响尺度为 $r_j$,仅在 $n_{T,j}=T-j+1$ 次预测中出现,由此导出滞留解析谱 $Γ_T(r)=\sum_{j=1}^{T}\log\!ig(1+n_{T,j}r_j^2\big)$。对任意可求和包络,局部贝叶斯混合给出 $\cR_T(r)\leq CΓ_T(r)$。在指数与多项式包络下,在给定有限样本维度条件下,通过 Toeplitz 设计反证法得 $\cR_T(r)\geq cΓ_T(r)$,常数依赖于衰减参数与 logit 界。因此 $Γ_T(r)$ 是该源类在典型情形下的极小极大累积后悔尺度,对应 $Θ(α^{-1}\log^2T)$($r_j=Ae^{-αj}$)与 $Θ(T^{1/(2s)})$($r_j=Aj^{-s}$,$s>1$)。反证针对外生滞后模型,非任意平稳无限记忆源的普适结论。仅保留最近 $h$ 个输入的代价为 $\sum_{j>h}n_{T,j}θ_j^2$,但相同截断谱可能导致多项式差异的后悔。缩放在线 Newton 预测器可达谱上界。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

We study online prediction for a specific finite-alphabet, exogenously driven source with infinite input memory. Independent Rademacher inputs $(U_t)$ are observed sequentially, and the next binary mark has logit $\sum_{j=1}^{t}θ_jU_{t+1-j}$, where $\abs{θ_j}\leq r_j$ and $\sum_jr_j\leq B$. Regret is expected cumulative excess log loss. Lag $j$ can affect prediction by scale $r_j$ and enters only $n_{T,j}=T-j+1$ prediction rounds, leading to the lag-resolved spectrum $Γ_T(r)=\sum_{j=1}^{T}\log\!\left(1+n_{T,j}r_j^2\right)$. For every summable envelope, a localized Bayesian mixture proves $\cR_T(r)\leq CΓ_T(r)$. For exponential and polynomial envelopes, under the stated finite-sample dimension condition, a Toeplitz-design converse proves $\cR_T(r)\geq cΓ_T(r)$, with constants allowed to depend on the fixed decay parameters and the logit bound. Thus $Γ_T(r)$ is the minimax cumulative-regret scale for this source class in these canonical regimes, giving $Θ(α^{-1}\log^2T)$ for $r_j=Ae^{-αj}$ and $Θ(T^{1/(2s)})$ for $r_j=Aj^{-s}$, $s>1$. The converse is specific to the exogenous lagged model and is not a profile-only theorem for arbitrary stationary infinite-memory sources. Retaining only the most recent $h$ inputs costs order $\sum_{j>h}n_{T,j}θ_j^2$, yet the same worst-case truncation profile can correspond to polynomially different regret. A scaled online Newton predictor attains the spectrum upper bound.

在线学习后悔分析长程依赖

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。