韩语谓词形态中，词义决定发音形式，非仅由词干和词尾决定。
Lexically conditioned realization ambiguity in Korean predicate morphology
- 词义与句法角色影响相同词干词尾的发音选择
- 规则与不规则配对中存在同形异音现象
- 适合研究形态学与语义交互的学者参考
本文探讨韩语表层实现与形态分析的区别。研究发现，相同的规范词素序列与语法类别标签，并不能唯一确定表层形式。在一类具有理论意义的韩语谓词中，形式相同或近似的词干-词尾组合会因词汇身份和实现类归属不同而产生不同输出。该现象被分析为屈折发散的同形异义，涉及规则与双音不规则对、规则与bieup不规则对、reu不规则与reo不规则对。结果表明，词干形状和词尾并不总能决定表层实现，词义、子分类及语义角色结构共同决定目标谓词，谓词决定实现类，实现类决定表层形式。韩语实现机制揭示了单纯形态表示的局限性。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
This paper examines Korean surface realization as distinct from morphological analysis. It asks whether a sequence of canonical morphemes and grammatical category labels uniquely determines the corresponding surface form. The answer is negative for a restricted but theoretically revealing class of Korean predicates. In these cases, formally identical or near-identical stem-ending configurations yield different outputs depending on lexical identity and realization class membership. We analyze this phenomenon as homonymy with inflectional divergence, focusing on regular versus digeut irregular pairs, regular versus bieup irregular pairs, and reu irregular versus reo irregular pairs. These cases show that stem shape and ending alone do not always determine surface realization. Instead, lexical meaning, subcategorization, and semantic role structure help identify the intended predicate; the predicate determines the realization class; and the realization class determines the surface form. Korean realization thus reveals a limit of bare morphological representation.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。