arXiv:2608.28080cs.CV2026-08

提出新评测框架,检测图像生成3D的结构稳定性和可用性。

Cyc3D: Evaluating Cyclic Structural Stability and Asset Usability in Image-to-3D Generation

论文配图:Cyc3D: Evaluating Cyclic Structural Stability and Asset Usability in Image-to-3D Generation
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 设计闭环循环评估法,检测生成3D在多视角下的稳定性。
  • 实测顶尖模型循环稳定性不足48分,暴露视觉可信与结构可靠差距。
  • 适合关注3D生成质量、图形管线可用性的研究者和开发者。

图像条件下的3D生成技术快速发展,但现有评估多聚焦渲染视图的合理性与语义一致性,忽略了生成结果是否具备稳定的3D解释能力及在图形管线中的可用性。我们提出Cyc3D,一个多维度基准,从两个互补维度评估图像到3D生成:跨视图对象一致性和表示质量。在资产层面,衡量对象身份在不同视点下语义的一致性;在模型层面,提出视图循环结构一致性(View-Cycle Structural Consistency),通过重渲染-再生-对齐的闭环流程,量化几何、感知与语义漂移。为评估生成物在渲染外的实际可用性,还测试几何结构、参考图像保真度、网格离散化效率与UV参数化质量。这些诊断可揭示单一感知分数掩盖的问题,提供模型不稳定与表示缺陷的可解释证据。在五种代表性图像到3D系统上的实验表明,闭源前馈模型在几何保真度、网格质量和循环稳定性上持续优于开源优化基线,但即使最强方法循环稳定性也低于48,揭示了视觉合理生成与鲁棒3D理解之间的持久鸿沟。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Image-conditioned 3D generation has advanced rapidly, yet existing evaluation protocols largely judge rendered-view plausibility and semantic alignment, overlooking whether a generator forms a stable 3D interpretation and produces assets usable in graphics pipelines. We introduce Cyc3D, a multidimensional benchmark that evaluates image-to-3D generation along two complementary axes: Cross-View Object Consistency and Representation Quality. At the asset level, Cyc3D measures whether object identity remains semantically coherent across rendered viewpoints. At the model level, we propose View-Cycle Structural Consistency, a closed-loop render-regenerate-align protocol that repeatedly re-observes a generated asset from novel views and quantifies geometric, perceptual, and semantic drift across generations. To assess native asset usability beyond rendered appearance, Cyc3D further evaluates geometric structure, reference-image fidelity, mesh discretization and efficiency, and UV parameterization quality. Together, these diagnostics expose failures obscured by a single perceptual score and provide interpretable evidence of both model instability and representation defects. Experiments on five representative image-to-3D systems show that closed-source feed-forward models consistently outperform open-source optimization-based baselines in geometric fidelity, mesh quality, and cycle stability. Nevertheless, even the strongest methods achieve cycle-stability scores below 48, revealing a persistent gap between visually plausible generation and robust 3D object understanding.

3D生成评估基准结构稳定性资产可用性

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。