arXiv:2608.29617cs.CLcs.AI2026-08

用知识图谱和多智能体对抗推理,高效精准识别假信息。

Memory-First Fact-Checking: A Knowledge-Graph-Grounded Multi-Agent System for Misinformation Detection

论文配图:Memory-First Fact-Checking: A Knowledge-Graph-Grounded Multi-Agent System for Misinformation Detection
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 先查知识图谱,不够再上网查,避免盲目检索。
  • 在新冠假信息数据集上准确率达97.4%,F1为92.6%。
  • 适合需要可解释性与持续学习的可信信息验证场景。

本文提出一种混合式事实核查框架,将基于知识图谱的语义记忆与对抗性多智能体推理相结合,实现可解释的虚假信息检测。该系统采用内存优先、网络为辅的架构:输入声明首先通过句向量语义检索与自然语言推断,在双索引知识图谱中进行评估;若图谱证据不足,则调用可信网络源,并由支持、反驳与裁判三类智能体组成的对抗法庭进行判断。一个图谱感知置信度机制融合语义相似度、NLI置信度与图结构证据,决定是否需外部检索,从而减少不必要的网络查询。验证后的信息以结构化三元组形式回填至知识图谱,支持系统语义记忆的增量扩展。在精选的新冠假信息基准上实验表明,该框架对可解决声明的准确率达97.4%,宏平均F1为92.6%,优于使用Llama~3.3~70B的基线(准确率87.7%,宏平均F1 86.3%)。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

This paper introduces a hybrid fact-checking framework that integrates Knowledge Graph-based semantic memory with adversarial multi-agent reasoning for explainable misinformation detection. The proposed system follows a memory-first, web-fallback architecture, in which input claims are initially evaluated against a dual-index Knowledge Graph through Sentence-BERT-based semantic retrieval and Natural Language Inference. When the evidence retrieved from the graph is insufficient to support a reliable decision, the framework collects information from trusted web sources and assesses it using an adversarial tribunal composed of support, contradiction, and judging agents. A graph-aware confidence mechanism combines semantic similarity, NLI confidence, and structural graph evidence to determine whether internal knowledge is sufficient, thereby reducing unnecessary web retrieval. Following verification, validated information is transformed into structured triples and incorporated into the Knowledge Graph, supporting the incremental expansion of the system's semantic memory. Experimental evaluation on a curated COVID-19 misinformation benchmark demonstrates that the proposed framework achieves an accuracy of 97.4\% and a macro-averaged F1-score of 92.6% on resolved claims, outperforming a Llama~3.3~70B baseline, which obtains an accuracy of 87.7% and a macro-averaged F1-score of 86.3%.

事实核查知识图谱多智能体可解释性

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。