Qwen3.8-Next通过稀疏专家设计实现高效训练,性能超越更大模型。
On the Design of Qwen3.8-Next Architecture: Evaluation, Efficiency, and Training Stability

- 采用稀疏专家架构,每令牌激活仅60亿参数,降低计算负担。
- 在14项预训练任务中,性能优于3970亿参数模型,且训练成本仅为1/9。
- 创新门控残差与混合注意力机制,提升训练稳定性和推理效率。
我们描述了Qwen3.8-Flash-Next的架构与消融实验,这是一个拥有1250亿参数的稀疏专家模型,每令牌激活60亿参数,并额外使用510亿参数的n-gram嵌入表,其数据保留在加速器外。在14个预训练基准上,该模型在8项任务中优于3970亿参数的A17B基线模型,其余任务表现差距不超过2.6分,但仅需1/3的激活参数、1/3的训练样本和约1/9的训练浮点运算量。令牌混合采用层间混合的门控增量网络(GDN)与全局注意力,每四层包含一层全注意力;持续预训练时,全注意力层被替换为基于微块粒度的压缩轻量索引器的Qwen稀疏注意力(QSA)。残差流扩展为四分支并通过逐元素门控读取,称为门控残差(GR)。容量通过单一预取自主机内存的n-gram嵌入层添加。我们从损失、下游任务表现、训练/预填充/解码开销及最优超参与训练稳定性三个维度评估每个设计变更。损失与下游准确率并非同步:扩大n-gram词汇量持续降低损失,但下游准确率趋于饱和。架构与Muon优化器共同提升最优学习率与批量大小,消除批量预热需求,并显著增强压力测试下的稳定性。损失、性能、效率与稳定性构成一个协同优化问题,联合求解可得同时更高效、更强大、更稳定的方案。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
We describe the architecture and ablations of Qwen3.8-Flash-Next, a sparse mixture-of-experts model with 125B parameters, 6B activated per token, and additional 51B parameters of n-gram embedding tables held off the accelerator. On fourteen pre-training benchmarks the model leads the 397B-A17B predecessor on eight and trails it on the rest by at most 2.6 points, at 1/3 the activated parameters, 1/3 the training tokens, and roughly 1/9 the training FLOPs. Token mixing uses a layer-wise hybrid of Gated DeltaNet (GDN) and global attention, with one full-attention layer in every four; at continued-pretraining time those full-attention layers are replaced by Qwen Sparse Attention (QSA), which scores context at micro-block granularity with a compressed lightweight indexer. The residual stream is widened to four branches and read through an elementwise gate, a design we call the Gated Residual (GR). Capacity is added outside the backbone by a single n-gram embedding layer whose tables are prefetched from host memory. We evaluate every candidate change along three axes: loss together with downstream benchmarks; the cost of the change in training, prefill and decode; and its effect on the optimal hyperparameters and training stability. Loss and downstream accuracy do not always move together: enlarging the n-gram vocabulary lowers loss monotonically while downstream accuracy saturates. The architecture and the Muon optimizer together shift the optimal learning rate and batch size upwards, render batch-size warmup unnecessary, and substantially improve stability under stress tests. Loss, benchmarks, efficiency and stability form one design problem. Solved jointly, they yield a recipe that is simultaneously more efficient, more capable and more stable.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。