arXiv:2609.02821cs.AIcs.LG2026-09综述

用AI重构个体与群体效应,验证其在职业研究中的有效性

AI Contextual Measurement for Recovering Individual and Group-Level Effects: Validation Against Survey Measures and an Occupational Application

  • 将AI生成的个体测量值拆解为群体均值与个体偏差,同时捕捉群体间与组内关系
  • 在2022年中国家庭追踪调查中,AI测得的工作时长与满意度负相关性复现率达90%以上
  • 适合从丰富数据中恢复少数理论重要构念,但受限于信息量和多概念共缺失

研究人员越来越多地利用人工智能构建社会、组织及职业特征的度量,这些特征常缺失于传统调查。本文提出AICOME(AI情境测量)框架,评估基于受访者层面的AI度量能否在情境模型中还原个体与群体效应。核心思想是:在受访者层面构建的AI度量可用于推导其群体聚合值与个体偏离值,从而同时估计群体间与组内关联,而非仅作为响应预测。我们以2022年中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)为实证基础,以职业作为分组结构,多个与工作相关的调查变量作为验证基准。针对计算机使用、外语使用、每周工作时长和管理职责,比较了调查测量与AI衍生测量在响应水平、模型水平、情境分析和边界条件下的表现。结果表明,在拥有丰富的受访者与岗位特征条件下,AI情境测量能有效恢复调查变量所含的情境模型信息。其中,每周工作时长的验证最为充分,其AI测量复现了CFPS中显著的跨职业与组内满意度负相关关系。框架也揭示了明确边界条件:当信息仅限职业与基本人口统计时性能下降,且当多个相关概念同时未被观测时恢复效果减弱。研究提示,AICOME最适用于从现有丰富数据中恢复有限数量的理论重要构念。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Researchers increasingly use artificial intelligence to construct measures of social, organizational, and occupational characteristics that are absent from conventional surveys. We propose AICOME, AI COntextual MEasurement, a framework for evaluating whether AI-derived respondent-level measures can recover individual and group-level effects in contextual models. The key idea is that an AI measure constructed at the respondent level can be used to derive its group-level aggregate and its individual deviation, allowing researchers to estimate both between-group and within-group associations rather than treating AI measurement as response prediction alone. We validate the framework using the 2022 China Family Panel Studies (CFPS), where occupations provide the empirical grouping structure and several job-related survey variables provide validation benchmarks. For computer use, foreign-language use, weekly hours, and management responsibilities, we compare survey measures with AI-derived measures in response-level, model-level, contextual, and boundary-condition validations. The results show that AI contextual measurement can recover much of the contextual-model information contained in observed survey variables when rich respondent and job characteristics are available. Weekly hours provides the strongest validation case, with AI-derived measures reproducing the large negative between- and within-occupation associations with satisfaction observed in CFPS. The framework also identifies clear boundary conditions: performance deteriorates when information is restricted to occupation and basic demographics, and recovery is weaker when several related concepts are treated as simultaneously unobserved. The findings suggest that AICOME is most useful for recovering a limited number of theoretically important constructs from rich existing datasets.

AI测量情境建模职业研究数据验证

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。