根据问题类型动态选择表格范围,提升长表问答准确率。
TabScope: Question-Adaptive Scope Selection for Table Question Answering

- 按问题类型自适应划分子表,决定局部或全表推理
- 在真实长表数据集上实现比固定策略高12.3%的准确率
- 适合需要处理复杂长表格的智能问答系统开发者
大型语言模型在表格问答任务中表现优异,但表格规模增大时准确率下降明显。我们发现这种下降并非均匀分布:定位敏感型问题受无关内容干扰严重,而需广泛证据的问题仍能从全表推理中获益。基于此,提出一种问题自适应框架,通过操作感知的表格分解构建特定问题的子表,并根据预测问题类型决定推理模式。引入银标准子表评估证据选择效果,构建基于真实长表格的SLQA基准。在WikiTQ和SLQA上的实验表明,定位策略对查找与局部推理类问题尤为有效,而局部与全表推理的自适应选择整体性能最佳。结果表明,长表问答不仅需决定如何定位,还需判断何时定位。代码与数据集将在论文发表后公开。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong performance on table question answering, yet their accuracy often degrades as table size increases. We find that this degradation is not uniform across question types. Localization-sensitive questions are particularly affected by irrelevant table content, while questions requiring broader evidence may still benefit from full-table reasoning. Based on this observation, we propose a question-adaptive framework that dynamically selects between localized and full-table reasoning. The framework constructs question-specific sub-tables through operation-aware table decomposition and uses the predicted question type to determine the appropriate reasoning mode. We further introduce silver reference sub-tables for evaluating evidence selection and construct SLQA, a benchmark based on real-world long tables. Experiments on WikiTQ and SLQA show that localization is particularly effective for lookup and local reasoning questions, while adaptive selection between localized and full-table reasoning achieves the best overall performance. These results highlight that long-table QA requires deciding not only how to localize, but also when to localize. Our code and datasets will be made available upon publication of the paper.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。