arXiv:2609.04651cs.AI2026-09

动态调整推荐图谱,让系统自动适应用户意图变化。

Continual Graph Memory for Adaptive Recommendation under Intent Drift

论文配图:Continual Graph Memory for Adaptive Recommendation under Intent Drift
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 用可更新的图记忆存储稳定知识和近期反馈教训
  • 在固定模型下通过写入记忆提升推荐效果,最高增益29.58%
  • 适合需要持续学习、避免重复失败的推荐场景

本文研究意图漂移下的自适应推荐问题,其中每次推荐结果的反馈可揭示用于排序的关系证据是否有效、缺失或误导。尽管知识图谱(KGs)提供重要语义结构应对这些变化,但传统KG增强系统将图视为静态检索底座,对演变意图、噪声元数据和重复失败模式敏感。本文提出CGM-Rec,一种持续图记忆框架。该框架将图状态视为可写记忆,维护两个互补组件:语义图记忆通过质量门控的类型操作保守更新,存储稳定高信度关系知识;情景经验记忆作为快速响应记忆,学习近期结果、失败案例和修正提示。测试时模型参数冻结,仅通过记忆写入实现适应。我们在固定参数、单次重排序协议下评估,编码器与提示保持不变,适应仅通过记忆写入完成。多组推荐设置实验表明,CGM-Rec在多数指标上优于神经与LLM基线。尤其在采样候选重排序中,于Bundle数据集上相比最强的LLM基线,HR@1提升达29.58%;在元数据丰富的ML-100K上,HR@5达到0.5941,优于K-RagRec的0.4746。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

This paper studies adaptive recommendation under intent drift, where feedback from each recommendation outcome can reveal whether the relational evidence used for ranking is useful, missing, or misleading. While Knowledge Graphs (KGs) provide essential semantic structure to handle these shifts, traditional KG-enhanced systems treat the graph as a static retrieval substrate, making it brittle to evolving intents, noisy metadata, and recurring failure patterns. This paper proposes CGM-Rec, a continual graph memory framework for adaptive recommendation. CGM-Rec treats the graph state as a writable memory and maintains two complementary components. Therein, a Semantic Graph Memory is updated conservatively through quality-gated typed operations for storing stable and high-confidence relational knowledge. Meanwhile, an Episodic Lesson Memory acts as a fast reactive memory that learns recent outcomes, failure cases, and corrective hints. During testing, model parameters remain frozen and adaptation occurs only through memory writes. We evaluate CGM-Rec under a frozen-parameter, one-pass reranking protocol, where encoders and prompts remain fixed during testing and adaptation occurs only through memory writes. Experiments across multiple recommendation settings show that CGM-Rec improves over evaluated neural and LLM-based baselines on most metrics. Particularly, under sampled-candidate reranking, CGM-Rec improves HR@1 by up to 29.58% over the strongest LLM baseline on Bundle, and outperforms K-RagRec on metadata-rich ML-100K with HR@5 of 0.5941 versus 0.4746.

推荐系统知识图谱持续学习意图漂移

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。