arXiv:2609.05516cs.CVcs.LG2026-09

用损失频率特征动态调整任务权重,提升自动驾驶多任务感知性能。

An Exploratory Study of Frequency-Aware Task Weighting for YOLOv8-Based Unified Driving Perception

论文配图:An Exploratory Study of Frequency-Aware Task Weighting for YOLOv8-Based Unified Driving Perception
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 基于近期损失历史的低频能量比,动态分配任务权重
  • 静态训练下整体得分和车道分割指标最优,检测任务表现也领先
  • 为多任务学习提供新思路,适合研究统一感知架构的开发者

统一感知使自动驾驶系统在单一网络中完成目标检测、可行驶区域分割和车道分割,提升效率并降低部署复杂度。联合优化多个感知任务仍具挑战,因各任务收敛速度、损失尺度与优化稳定性不同。现有任务加权方法依赖损失幅度、学习不确定性、短期损失变化或梯度统计;本文探索最近损失历史窗口的频率结构作为补充信号。我们提出频率感知任务加权(FTW),通过近期损失轨迹的低频能量比估算损失稳定性代理,赋予均值中心化损失轨迹中低频能量占比更大的任务更高权重。在基于YOLOv8的统一感知框架(含三个任务专用头)上,对比静态训练与渐进式冻结两种配置,在Mapillary Vistas数据集上评估FTW与固定权重及不确定性加权方法。报告每轮运行中验证损失最低检查点的最终保持指标。六组单次运行结果显示:静态FTW取得最高总体得分与车道mIoU,渐进式FTW在检测mAP上最优,不确定性加权在可行驶区域mIoU上最佳。虽无重复种子估计、单任务基线或FTW消融实验,但结果表明损失频率加权在该流程中可行,尚不能确立优于基线或超出报告运行范围的泛化能力。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Unified perception enables autonomous driving systems to perform object detection, drivable-area segmentation, and lane segmentation within a single network, improving efficiency and reducing deployment complexity. Jointly optimizing multiple perception tasks remains challenging because tasks exhibit different convergence rates, loss scales, and optimization stability. Existing task-weighting methods use loss magnitude, learned uncertainty, short-term loss changes, or gradient statistics; here, we explore the frequency structure of a recent loss-history window as a complementary signal. We implement and examine Frequency-aware Task Weighting (FTW), a dynamic task-balancing rule that estimates a loss-trajectory stability proxy from the low-frequency energy ratio of recent loss histories. FTW assigns larger weights to tasks whose mean-centered loss trajectories contain a larger proportion of low-frequency power. We document FTW and two baselines under full-network static training and progressive freezing using a unified YOLOv8-based perception framework with three task-specific heads. Experiments on Mapillary Vistas compare FTW with fixed and uncertainty-based weighting under both configurations. Final holdout metrics are reported for the checkpoint with the lowest per-epoch validation loss in each run. Across six single-run configurations, static FTW has the largest derived overall score and lane mIoU, progressive FTW has the largest detection mAP, and static uncertainty weighting has the largest drivable-area mIoU. Without repeated-seed estimates, single-task baselines, or FTW ablations, these rankings are descriptive. The evidence supports the feasibility of loss-frequency-based weighting in this pipeline, but does not establish improvement over the baselines or generalization beyond the reported runs.

自动驾驶多任务学习目标检测损失加权

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。