arXiv:2609.06391cs.AIcs.CL2026-09

构建可信图智能检索生成系统,防范错误传播保障社会公益应用

Building Trustworthy Graph-Agentic RAG for Social Good: Architectures, Failure Propagation, and Assurance by Construction

论文配图:Building Trustworthy Graph-Agentic RAG for Social Good: Architectures, Failure Propagation, and Assurance by Construction
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 设计五类接口契约,显式管理证据溯源与权限控制
  • 揭示从证据到结论的错误传播链,识别多环节耦合风险
  • 适合需高可追溯性与问责制的公共政策、医疗等场景

图智能检索增强生成结合结构化证据与自适应控制器,支持规划检索、关系遍历、中间命题验证、子任务委派及工具使用。当答案依赖跨文档、实体、时间或机构的关系时尤为有效,但也会导致缺陷在图构建阶段被引入,进而作为证据影响后续决策并传播至最终结果。本文针对社会公益场景下对时效性、授权、可追溯性、监督与救济的要求,系统梳理图基质、生命周期、代理功能、协调模式与权责边界,区分基于图的检索与依赖观测的图控制。提出一种‘构建即保证’的蓝图,包含证据、检索、推理、能力与委派、结果五类接口契约,明确证明来源、时效性、授权、不确定性与可恢复性。通过公共利益信息设计案例展示框架如何约束图结构、权限、不回答与操作权限。最后提出涵盖图断言、轨迹、主张、协调与结果的评估议程。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Graph-agentic retrieval-augmented generation combines structured evidence with adaptive controllers that can plan retrieval, traverse relations, verify intermediate claims, delegate subtasks, and use tools. This combination is useful when answers depend on relations across documents, entities, time, or institutions, but it also creates coupled failure paths: a defect in graph construction can become retrieved evidence, alter later control decisions, and propagate toward a consequential outcome. We examine how such systems should be designed and evaluated for social-good settings in which freshness, authorization, traceability, oversight, and recourse matter alongside answer quality. We organize the literature by graph substrate, graph lifecycle, agent function, coordination pattern, and authority boundary, and distinguish graph-based retrieval from observation-dependent graph control. We then synthesize reported risks as an evidence-to-action failure chain and propose an assurance-by-construction blueprint comprising five interface contracts for evidence, retrieval, reasoning, capability and delegation, and outcome. These contracts make provenance, temporal validity, authorization, uncertainty, and recoverability explicit at system boundaries. An illustrative public-benefit information design shows how the framework constrains graph structure, permissions, abstention, and operating authority. Finally, we derive an evaluation agenda spanning graph assertions, trajectories, claims, coordination, and outcomes.

图神经网络可信AI检索增强社会公益

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。