让不同大模型代理共享工具调用知识,提升协作效率。
Typed Federated Artifacts for the Agentic Web:Sharing Tool-Routing Knowledge Across Frozen,Heterogeneous LLM Agents

- 用带类型的联邦构件统一存储和传递工具调用规则。
- 在3180个工具上实现每轮仅20MB数据传输,精度接近中心化方案。
- 适合构建跨平台智能代理系统的开发者与研究者。
一个开放的网络化代理生态允许各厂商的冻结模型独立运行、私密保存历史,并互相学习何时调用何种工具。传统文本(提示、示例池)难以区分噪声、合并规则与文档;权重和适配器无法跨平台迁移此类知识。本文提出共享类型化的联邦构件——具有结构化字段、支持字段级隐私保护、争议解决与跨模型迁移的验证对象,并实例化为SYNAPSE1,作为通用的工具路由知识库。在去除192条垃圾条目和1916条重复/近似测试查询后,联邦知识库在StableToolBench(含3,180个工具)上每客户端每轮仅需20MB JSON数据,路由表现距中心化方案相差不足1.1分。将相同经验以结构化字段形式呈现而非单一字符串,干净数据下提升8.5分,60%注入矛盾时仍保持7.4分。融合与渲染过程不可分割(扁平化合并表现最差),三种冲突处理策略无显著差异。各知识库分支均使GPT-4o代理每步工具调用准确率至少提升6.7分,归因于格式优化而非联邦训练本身。但两个警示发现指出:在标注数学代理和StableToolBench上,基于TF-IDF的分类器在相同经验上超越所有大模型路由方案48分和26分,主因是基准测试池中已包含每个未见工具及测试查询的标签与原文,导致无法衡量无标签工具的真正路由能力——而这是路由存在的核心意义。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
An open, networked web will allow agents to run frozen models from multiple vendors, keep their history private, and teach each other which tool to call and when. Flat text (prompts, example pools) makes it difficult for the protocol to distinguish between noise statistics, merging rules, and documentation. Weights and adapters cannot transfer that knowledge between platforms. We suggest sharing typed federated artifacts, schema-validated objects with well-defined fields for per-field privacy (described here, but measured), dispute resolution, and cross-model transfer, and instantiating them as SYNAPSE1, a common tool-routing knowledge. After deleting 192 garbage entries and 1,916 training items that duplicate or almost duplicate test queries, a federated compendium routes within 1.1 points of a centralized one at 20 MB of JSON per client each round on StableToolBench (3,180 tools). The same experience merged and shown to the router as typed fields rather than one flat string is worth 8.5 points on clean data and 7.4 under 60% injected contradiction. Crossing merge and rendering shows the halves are inseparable (the typed merge shown flat is the worst arm), while three conflict policies are indistinguishable, so the conflict log that motivated this work is not the On {\tau}-bench retail, each compendium arm improves GPT-4o agents' per-step tool-call accuracy by at least 6.7 points, attributed to format rather than federated experience. Two cautionary findings conclude the paper: on a topic-labeled math proxy and StableToolBench, a TF-IDF classifier over the same labeled experience beats every LLM routing arm (by 48 and 26 points, mostly retrieval recall) because the benchmark's pool holds labeled queries for every supposedly unseen tool and every test query verbatim before our filter. It cannot measure routing to tools without labels, which routing exists for.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。