arXiv:2609.08832cs.AI2026-09

让大模型代理更稳定,减少执行失败的波动性。

Closing the Consistency Gap: Self-Evolving Agents That Learn to Stay on Course

论文配图:Closing the Consistency Gap: Self-Evolving Agents That Learn to Stay on Course
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 通过分析轨迹不一致点,自动提取经验并存入记忆。
  • 在相同任务上五次全成功率提升至69%,跨任务也提升至66%。
  • 适合追求高可靠性的实际部署场景,如自动化流程系统。

基于大语言模型的智能体虽然平均表现准确,但在实际应用中却存在可靠性问题。例如,在AppWorld基准上使用GPT-4.1的ReAct代理,尽管单次成功率平均达77%,但重复五次任务全部成功的比例仅为53%,两者之间存在24个百分点的差异,称为一致性差距。本文提出一种自演化代理框架,通过一致性分析器识别轨迹中不稳定、低一致性的步骤,并将其转化为可复用的指导规则存入记忆。该框架在相同任务上的五次全成功率提升16个百分点,在相似任务泛化上提升13个百分点,显著缩小了性能波动,为可信智能体部署提供了关键支撑。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Large language model (LLM)-powered agents can be accurate on average yet unreliable in production, a discrepancy that has been observed but remains largely unaddressed. When given the same task five times, a ReAct agent on the AppWorld benchmark using GPT-4.1 succeeds in all five runs only 53% of the time, even though its per-run pass rate averages 77%. We call this 24-point shortfall the consistency gap, and we argue that addressing it is a precondition for trustworthy AI agent deployment. We present a self-evolving agent framework that reduces this gap by identifying unstable, low-consistency steps in agent trajectories and converting them into episodic memory the agent can draw on in future runs. At its core is a Consistency Analyzer that pinpoints where and why a trajectory is likely to flip across executions, and a Guideline Generator that converts the diagnosis into targeted guidelines, committed to memory and injected into future agent executions on similar tasks. On AppWorld with ReAct/GPT-4.1, our framework raises the fraction of tasks that succeed in all five runs by +16 points on same-task evaluation and +13 points on similar-task generalization.

智能体一致性自演化可靠性

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。